Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判

Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判

ID:40848193

大小:367.91 KB

页数:14页

时间:2019-08-08

Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判_第1页
Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判_第2页
Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判_第3页
Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判_第4页
Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判_第5页
资源描述:

《Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability acritique of critical disability studies道德错误、缺点和残疾:A 批判残疾研究批判》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、Disability&SocietyISSN:0968-7599(Print)1360-0508(Online)Journalhomepage:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cdso20Moralwrongs,disadvantages,anddisability:acritiqueofcriticaldisabilitystudiesSimoVehmas&NickWatsonTocitethisarticle:SimoVehmas&NickWatson(2014)Moralwrongs,disadvantages,anddisabi

2、lity:acritiqueofcriticaldisabilitystudies,Disability&Society,29:4,638-650,DOI:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751Tolinktothisarticle:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751©2013Taylor&FrancisPublishedonline:06Nov2013.SubmityourarticletothisjournalArticleviews:14037ViewCrossmarkdataCiting

3、articles:40ViewcitingarticlesFullTerms&Conditionsofaccessandusecanbefoundathttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cdso20Disability&Society,2014Vol.29,No.4,638–650,http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751Moralwrongs,disadvantages,anddisability:acritiqueof

4、criticaldisabilitystudiesabSimoVehmas*andNickWatsonabDisabilityStudies,UniversityofHelsinki,Helsinki,Finland;DisabilityStudies,UniversityofGlasgow,Glasgow,UK(Received31January2013;finalversionreceived11July2013)Criticaldisabilitystudies(CDS)hasemergedasanapproachtothestudyofdisabilityov

5、erthelastdecadeorsoandhassoughttopresentachallengetothepredominantlymaterialistlinefoundinthemoreconventionaldisabilitystudiesapproaches.Inmuchthesamewaythattheoriginaldevelopmentofthesocialmodelresultedinanecessarycorrectiontotheoverlyindividualizedaccountsofdisabilitythatprevailedinm

6、uchoftheinterpretiveaccountswhichthendominatedmedicalsociology,sotoohasCDSchallengedthematerialistlineofdisabilitystudies.Inthispaperwereviewtheideasbehindthisdevelopmentandanalyseandcritiquesomeofitskeyideas.Thepaperstartswithabriefoverviewofthemaintheoristsandapproachescontainedwithi

7、nCDSandthenmovesontonormativeissues;namely,totheethicalandpoliticalapplicabilityofCDS.Keywords:criticaldisabilitystudies;ethics;justice;politicalphilosophyPointsofinterestThisarticleexaminesandcritiquestheideasfoundwithincriticaldisabilitystudies(CDS).Thearticlearguesthattheaccount

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。