2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)

2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)

ID:40847365

大小:335.10 KB

页数:37页

时间:2019-08-08

2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)_第1页
2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)_第2页
2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)_第3页
2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)_第4页
2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)_第5页
资源描述:

《2.the 7th Vis Moot-Memo for Respondant-the Third Place(Paris Lodron University, Salzburg)》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、AnnualWillemC.VisInternationalCommercialArbitrationMoot1999-2000MEMORANDUMFORRESPONDENTParisLodronUniversityofSalzburgTeam:AlexandraFrantsuzovaIsabelleInnerhoferStephanieKathanRolandLohnertSabinePrennErwinSchönIngoSteinwenderLondonCourtofInternationalArbitra

2、tionHultonHouse,6thFloor161-166FleetStreetLondonEC4A2DYCaseNo.Moot7Claimant:FeedProcessingCorp.123IndustrialAvenue,Highlands,Mediterraneo.v.Respondent:RepresentedbySalzburgUniversityTeamGrainDealers,PLC26ExportPl.,SouthsideCity,Danubia.MemorandumforResponden

3、tTABLEOFCONTENTS:TableofReferencesTableofCasesAbbreviationsTotheFormofthisMemorandumINTRODUCTIONISSUE1:TheTribunallacksjurisdictionA.Noenforceablecontractwasconcluded,thereforenoagreementtoarbitrateexistsbetweentheparties(Art.7(1)MAL)B.Evenifthepartieshadcon

4、cludedacontract,theformalrequirementsforanagreementtoarbitratewerenotmet(Art.7(2)MAL)ISSUE2:Mr.Dean'switnessstatementshouldbeexcludedor,atleast,deserveslessthanfullweightandambiguitiesthereinshouldbeconstruedagainstClaimantISSUE3:NocontractconcludedbetweenRe

5、spondentandClaimantA.FormationofacontractintheCISGB.NointentiontobeboundC.Nomeetingofminds(dissent)C.1.Allegedconclusionon19February1998C.2.Allegedconclusionon20February1998C.3.Allegedconclusionon24February1998C.4.MistakeexcludedfromCISGC.5.Claimantisnotenti

6、tledtoenforceonbasisofagencyISSUE4:ClaimantbreacheditsobligationtocooperateingoodfaithA.TheArbitralTribunalmayfindtheinterpretationofthesalescontractrequiredadaptationandClaimant'scooperationingoodfaithB.Thetradeusageofre-allocationrequiredClaimanttocooperate

7、ingoodfaithB.1.Tradeusageofre-allocationB.2.Asaconsequenceofthetradeusageofre-allocation,ClaimanthadtheobligationtocooperateingoodfaithC.CISGrequiredadaptationofthecontractandClaimant'scooperationingoodfaithC.1.ChangeofbasicassumptionsonwhichcontractwasmadeC

8、.2.PromotionofgoodfaithandfairdealingunderCISGC.3.NopossibilitytoovercomegovernmentalinterferenceC.4.Claimant'sobligationtocooperateingoodfaithC.5.RespondenthadarighttoavoidthecontractISSUE5:Res

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。