Rationalization of Discrimination歧视合理化

《Rationalization of Discrimination歧视合理化》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、UniversityofMichiganLawSchoolUniversityofMichiganLawSchoolScholarshipRepositoryLaw&EconomicsWorkingPapers1-1-2013Evidence-BasedSentencingandtheScientificRationalizationofDiscriminationSonjaB.StarrUniversityofMichiganLawSchool,sbstarr@umich.eduFollowthisandadditionalworksat:http

2、://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_currentPartoftheCivilRightsandDiscriminationCommons,CriminalLawCommons,andtheCriminalProcedureCommonsWorkingPaperCitationStarr,SonjaB.,"Evidence-BasedSentencingandtheScientificRationalizationofDiscrimination"(2013).Law&EconomicsWorkingPapers

3、.Paper90.http://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/90ThisArticleisbroughttoyouforfreeandopenaccessbyUniversityofMichiganLawSchoolScholarshipRepository.IthasbeenacceptedforinclusioninLaw&EconomicsWorkingPapersbyanauthorizedadministratorofUniversityofMichiganLawSchoolSchol

4、arshipRepository.Formoreinformation,pleasecontactmlaw.repository@umich.edu.Starr:LAWANDECONOMICSRESEARCHPAPERSERIESPAPERNO.13-014SEPTEMBER2013EVIDENCE-BASEDSENTENCINGANDTHESCIENTIFICRATIONALIZATIONOFDISCRIMINATIONSONJAB.STARRFORTHCOMINGINSTANFORDL.REV.66(2014)THESOCIALSCIENCERE

5、SEARCHNETWORKELECTRONICPAPERCOLLECTION:HTTP://SSRN.COM/ABSTRACT=2318940FORMOREINFORMATIONABOUTTHEPROGRAMINLAWANDECONOMICSVISIT:HTTP://WWW.LAW.UMICH.EDU/CENTERSANDPROGRAMS/LAWANDECONOMICS/PAGES/DEFAULT.ASPXPublishedbyUniversityofMichiganLawSchoolScholarshipRepository,20131Law&Ec

6、onomicsWorkingPapers,Art.90[2013]Evidence-BasedSentencingandtheScientificRationalizationofDiscrimination*SonjaB.StarrForthcoming,STANFORDLAWREVIEW,Vol.66(2014)ABSTRACTThispapercritiques,onlegalandempiricalgrounds,thegrowingtrendofbasingcriminalsentencesonactuarialrecidivismrisk

7、predictioninstrumentsthatincludedemographicandsocioeconomicvariables.IarguethatthispracticeviolatestheEqualProtectionClauseandisbadpolicy:anexplicitembraceofotherwise-condemneddiscrimination,sanitizedbyscientificlanguage.Todemonstratethatthispracticeshouldbesubjecttoheightenedc

8、onstitutionalscrutiny,Icomprehensivelyreviewtherelevan