Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms

Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms

ID:40385289

大小:1.33 MB

页数:12页

时间:2019-08-01

Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms_第1页
Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms_第2页
Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms_第3页
Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms_第4页
Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms_第5页
资源描述:

《Amartya Sen-Justice Means versus Freedoms》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、PrincetonUniversityPressJustice:MeansversusFreedomsAuthor(s):AmartyaSenReviewedwork(s):Source:Philosophy&PublicAffairs,Vol.19,No.2(Spring,1990),pp.111-121Publishedby:BlackwellPublishingStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265406.Accessed:26/12/201101:05YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyou

2、racceptanceoftheTerms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jspJSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreasepro

3、ductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org.PrincetonUniversityPressandBlackwellPublishingarecollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoPhilosophy&PublicAffairs.http://www.jstor.orgAMARTYASENJustice:MeansversusFreedo

4、msThisarticleisconcernedwiththeinformationalbasisofjustice.Thein-formationalbasisofajudgmentidentifiestheinformationonwhichthejudgmentisdirectlydependentand-nolessimportant-assertsthatthetruthorfalsehoodofanyothertypeofinformationcannotdirectlyinflu-encethecorrectnessofthejudgment.'Theinfor

5、mationalbasisofjudg-mentsofjusticethusdeterminesthefactualterritoryoverwhichconsid-erationsofjusticewoulddirectlyapply.(Theimplicationsonothermatterswouldbederivative.)TheanalysispresentedherederivesagoodpartofitsmotivationandstructurefromRawlsiantheoryofjusticeasfairness.2However,IargueThi

6、sisapartofalongerpaper("TheTerritoryofJustice")whichformedthetextofmyMarionO'KellieMcKayLecturegivenattheUniversityofPittsburghonSeptemberI6,I988.MygreatestdebtistoJohnRawlsforhisenormouslyhelpfulcomments(eventhoughIamcriticalofhistheoryofjusticeinthisarticle).Ihavealsoprofitedagooddealfrom

7、thesuggestionsofG.A.Cohen,RonaldDworkin,DerekParfit,ThomasScanlon,andKevinSontheimer.i.Thediverseformsandvaryingrolesoftheinformationalbasisofnormativejudgmentshavebeendiscussedinmy"InformationalBasesofAlternativeWelfareApproaches:Aggre-gationandIncomeDi

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。