GRE Writing Argument

《GRE Writing Argument》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、GREWritingInsightofAAJimChen（陈晟）IntroductionofAAETS官方陈述Argumentisaclaimorasetofclaimswithreasonsandevidenceofferedassupport,alineofreasoningmeanttodemonstratethetruthorfalsehoodofsomething.ThepurposesoftheArgumenttaskaretoseehowwellequippedyouaretoinsightfullyevalu

2、ateanargumentwrittenbysomeoneelseandtoeffectivelycommunicateyourevaluationinwritingtoanacademicaudience.Yourtaskistodiscussthelogicalsoundnessoftheauthor'scasebycriticallyexaminingthelineofreasoningandtheuseofevidence.IntroductionofAAETS官方陈述Inreadingtheargument,you

3、shouldpayspecialattentionto:whatisofferedasevidence,supportorproofwhatisexplicitlystated,claimedorconcludedwhatisassumedorsupposed,perhapswithoutjustificationorproofwhatisnotstated,butnecessarilyfollowsfromwhatisstatedIntroductionofAAETS官方陈述Inaddition,youshould

4、considerthestructureoftheargument—thewayinwhichtheseelementsarelinkedtogethertoformalineofreasoning;i.e.,youshouldrecognizetheseparate,sometimesimplicitstepsinthethinkingprocessandconsiderwhetherthemovementfromeachsteptothenextislogicallysound.Intracingthisline,look

5、fortransitionwordsandphrasesthatsuggesttheauthorisattemptingtomakealogicalconnection(e.g.,however,thus,therefore,evidently,hence,inconclusion).IntroductionofAAETS官方陈述"AnalyzeanArgument"isacriticalthinkingtaskrequiringawrittenresponse.Consequently,theanalyticalskill

6、sdisplayedinyourevaluationcarrygreatweightindeterminingyourscore;however,theclaritywithwhichyouconveyideasisalsoimportanttoyouroverallscore.Remember:youdonotneedtoknowspecialanalyticaltechniquesandterminology.IntroductionofAA对ETS官方陈述的小结1、AA任务是写一篇驳斥别人文章的文章，不需要你自己的观点

7、！同时要牢记：不要同情作者，要极端无情地“削尖脑袋”去驳斥它、修理它！2、驳斥的内容（AA的文章内容）是别人的argument当中在推理过程中所犯的逻辑错误。注意：其他任何问题都与你无关！3、要驳斥别人的错误，首先要认识别人的错误，因此读题的关键，就是要弄清楚作者的逻辑链。AnalysisOutlineArgument的总体特征1、行文总体上讲属于归纳逻辑。其特点就是由n多的理由、证据、常识、调查结果、等等所组成的一系列证据（因）归纳总结出一个结论（果）。这一特征将对我们从对argument的解剖、分析、批驳整条思维中的每一

8、步都会有很重要的指导意义。AnalysisOutlineArgument的总体特征2、必须要指出：argument的攻击实际上就是对绝对化的攻击。事实上，argument中的推理过程中是有其合理性的。但问题是argument中所有的逻辑错误并不是错在可能性上，而是错在把可能