Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty

Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty

ID:39752133

大小:115.96 KB

页数:27页

时间:2019-07-10

Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty_第1页
Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty_第2页
Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty_第3页
Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty_第4页
Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty_第5页
资源描述:

《Love, Willing and Arendt’s Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、JamesMartelAmo:VoloutsisLove,willingandArendt’sreluctantembraceofsovereigntyAbstractAlthoughcriticalofwhatshecallsthe‘antipolitical’forcesofloveandsovereignty,Arendtreluctantlyembracestheseaspectsasthebasisofpoliticsitself.Iexplainthisparadoxbyarguin

2、gthatArendtseekstobalanceGreekandRomannotionsoffreedomwithmodernconceptionsofthewill.Thesolipsisticwillposesathreattopolitics(itisthesourceofsovereigntyitself).Yetthewillisafactofmodernlifeandcannotbeignored.Iarguethatdespiteherembraceofclassicalunde

3、rstandingsoffreedomascontingency,Arendtseekstolimitcontingencyandevenfreedomitself.Shedoesthistoaccommodatethewillwhichmusthavesomesenseofagencyandcontinuityinordertobeabletofunctionatall.Arendtarguesthatsovereigntycan,ifproperlyconstrained,producea‘

4、certainlimitedreality’andcan(alongwithlove)serveasabasisforpolitics.IclaimthatArendtsacrificesherclassicalideals,allowingforthepossibilityofamodern,lesserversionoffreedom(whichinherviewisbetterthannofreedomatall).Keywordslove·promising·sovereignty·wil

5、lThisarticlewillfocusonaparadoxinArendt’sthinking:ontheonehand,Arendtisdeeplysuspiciousofwhatshecallsthe‘antipolitical’,i.e.thoseaspectsofhumanlife(includinglove,theprivate,andevensovereignty)thatareatoddswithherdesiretore-establishapublicortrulypoli

6、ticalcommunity.Yet,atthesametime,atcertainpointsinherwriting,Arendtseemstoturntopreciselythesesupposedlyantipoliti-calforcesasthebasisforpoliticsitself.Inthefollowingpages,IwillexplainthisparadoxbywayofaconsiderationofhowArendt,howeverreluctantly,dis

7、tinguishesherselffromancientGreekandRomanconcep-tionsofpoliticswhereinsuchantipoliticalnotionsareanathema.1Atthecenterofthisdistinctionliestheconceptofthehumanwill;whilePHILOSOPHY&SOCIALCRITICISM•vol34no3•pp.287–313PSCCopyright©2008SAGEPublications(L

8、osAngeles,London,NewDelhiandSingapore)andDavidRasmussenwww.sagepublications.comDOI:10.1177/0191453707087254Downloadedfrompsc.sagepub.comatSunYat-SenUniversityonJuly26,2014288Philosophy&SocialCriticism34(3)theGreeksandRomanshadnosuchequivalentconcept,

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。