资源描述：
《Sect I：Logical Reasoning》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、SectionI:LogicalReasoningSectionI:Step2:UntangletheStimulusThezookeeper’sconclusionisthatJockokeptsilentLogicalReasoningstrategicallyinordertokeeptheotherchimpsawayfromhisfood.Thezookeeperbasesthisconclusiononanexperiment.WhenJockowasgivenalargequantityofbananas,heuttered
2、abarkthatdrewtheotherchimps,whostolehisfood.The1.(C)Inferencenextday,Jockowasgivenjustonebananaandkeptsilent.Step1:IdentifytheQuestionTypeStep3:MakeaPredictionThequestionstemasksyoutofillintheblankthatendstheThemoststraightforwardwaytoweakenanargumentisstimulus,soit’sanIn
3、ferencequestion.Basedonwhat’sgiven,toundermineitscentralassumption.Here,thezookeepertrytopredictthelogicalendingoftheargument.assumesthatJockostrategizedtokeepquietinordertoguardStep2:UntangletheStimulushisfood.ThatmeansthezookeeperislikewiseassumingthatThestimulusisessen
4、tiallyarecommendationtogrowstingingdifferenceinthequantityoffoodJockowasgivendidn’tmakenettlesnexttopotatoplantstoboostthepotatoplants’yield.thedifferenceinhisdecisiontoutterafoodbark.HeassumesStingingnettlesattractinsectsthatkillpotatoplantpests,Jockodidn’tthink,“Hey,her
5、e’sabunchofbananas;I’llcallbuttheyalsoattractaphidsthatarepotentiallyharmfultotheothers,”versus“Oh,asinglebanana—noreasontocallpotatoplants.Despitethemixedevidence,theauthorendsbyout.”Ifquantitydoesmakeadifference,thenitcouldaccountleavingtherecommendationunchanged.forJoc
6、ko’sdecisionnottobarkthesecondtime.Step3:MakeaPredictionStep4:EvaluatetheAnswerChoicesIftheauthorendsthepassagebyupholdingtheChoice(B)directlyattackstheauthor’sassumption.IfJockorecommendationdespitetheaphidissue,thenhemustkeptsilentbecausethequantityoffoodwassmallonthebe
7、lievethatthebenefitsofplantingstingingnettlesoutweighsecondday,thenhewasn’tdeliberatelytryingtokeepthetheproblemswithaphids.SincethisisanInferencequestion,otherchimpsfromstealinghisfood,andthezookeeper’syoudon’tneedtopredicttheanswerexactly.Butyoucanconclusionisindoubt.ap
8、proachtheanswerchoiceswithaflexibleprediction—inChoice(A)doesn’taffecttheargument.There’snoevide
