资源描述：
《God and science-Can we believe in both英文学习资料》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、PalliativeandSupportiveCare~2005!,3,167–169.PrintedintheUSA.Copyright©2005CambridgeUniversityPress1478-9515005$16.00DOI:10.10170S1478951505050273FROMTHEEDITORGodandscience:Canwebelieveinboth?AtarecentscientificconferenceinNewYorkCity,ageneticmutationandnaturalselection.Thispro
2、-studentaskedoneofthescientistsparticipatingincessofnaturalselectioncausedgradualbiologicalapaneldiscussiononscienceandreligionaprovoc-changesovertimeleadingtomoreandmorecom-ativequestion.“Canyoubeagoodscientistandplexlifeformsandculminatinginman.TheTheoryalsobelieveinGod?”The
3、scientist,aNobellaure-ofEvolutionconflictswiththebiblicalversionofate,quicklyresponded:“Beliefinthesupernatural,thecreationofmaninverydirectways.CertainlyespeciallybeliefinGod,isnotonlyincompatibleoneexampleofthisistheageoftheearth,which,withgoodscience,thiskindofbeliefisdamag
4、ingtoaccordingtomodernscientificevidenceismea-thewell-beingofthehumanrace!”Butdisdainforsuredinbillionsofyearsratherthantheapproxi-religionisfarfromuniversalamongscientists.Fran-matelysixthousandyears,aswouldbesuggestedcisCollins,whodirectstheU.S.NationalGenomebybiblicalaccoun
5、t.“Creationists,”orthosewhoResearchInstituteandwasheadofthefirstteambelievethattheBibledescribestheonlyaccuratetomaptheentirehumangenome,isanexampleoffactsofthecreationofmanandtheworld,haveahighlyvisibleandrespectedscientistwhoalsofailedintheirattemptstohavetheirbeliefin“Cre-o
6、penlyembracesareligiousChristianfaith.Aspal-ationism”taughtinU.S.publicschoolsalongsideliativecarecliniciansandresearchers,we,aswellDarwin’sTheoryofEvolution.Whathasnowtakenasourpatients,areconstantlyconfrontedwiththistheplaceof“Creationism”inthedebateoverwhatverydilemma:theag
7、e-oldtensionbetweenfaithshouldbetaughtinscienceclassesinschoolsistheandreason,Godandscience.“TheoryofIntelligentDesign.”TheTheoryofIntel-Eversincesciencerosetoprominenceasanin-ligentDesignbasicallystatesthatDarwin’sTheorytellectualandmoralforceinthe19thcentury,thereofEvolution
8、doesnotadequatelyexplaineitherhowhasbeenadebatebetweentwoworl
