资源描述:
《Kant's Theory of Knowledge:An Analytical Introduction》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、kant’stheoryofknowledgeThispageintentionallyleftblankkant’stheoryofknowledgeAnAnalyticalIntroductionGEORGESDICKER320043OxfordNewYorkAucklandBangkokBuenosAiresCapeTownChennaiDaresSalaamDelhiHongKongIstanbulKarachiKolkataKualaLumpurMadridMelbourneMexicoCity
2、MumbaiNairobiSa˜oPauloShanghaiSingaporeTaipeiTokyoTorontoCopyright2004byOxfordUniversityPress,Inc.PublishedbyOxfordUniversityPress,Inc.198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NewYork10016www.oup.comOxfordisaregisteredtrademarkofOxfordUniversityPressAllrightsreserved.No
3、partofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording,orotherwise,withoutthepriorpermissionofOxfordUniversityPress.LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataDicke
4、r,Georges,1942–Kant’stheoryofknowledge:ananalyticalintroduction/GeorgesDicker.p.cm.Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex.ISBN0-19-515306-5;ISBN0-19-515307-3(pbk.)1.Kant,Immanuel,1724–1804.KritikderreinenVernunft.2.Knowledge,Theoryof.3.Causation.4.Reas
5、on.I.Title.B2779.D532004121—dc222003061010987654321PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmericaonacid-freepaperToAlvinaThispageintentionallyleftblankPrefacehepartsofKant’sCritiqueofPureReasonthatpresenttheconstructivesideofThistheoryofknowledgearetheonesmostcommonly
6、readbystudentsandmostintenselydiscussedbymanyKantscholars.IreferespeciallytotheTranscen-dentalAestheticandtheTranscendentalAnalytic,whereKantattemptstodefendthepossibilityofhumanknowledgeagainsttheskepticalempiricismofDavidHumewithoutgoingbacktotherationa
7、lismofaLeibniz,Descartes,orSpinoza.ThesesectionsoftheCritiquearealsouniversallyrecognizedtobeamongthemostdifficultofallphilosophicalwritings,andstudentsfindthemquiteimpene-trableifapproachedwithoutthehelpofsecondarysources.Thereare,ofcourse,numerousscholarl
8、yworksontheCritiquethatdevoteattention—indeed,oftenhundredsofpages—tothesetexts.AllsuchworkswithwhichIamfamiliarareofextraordinarilyhighquality,intermsofboththeirphilosophicalmeritandtheirdepthofunderstandingofKant’