案例分析题【国际商法】

案例分析题【国际商法】

ID:35330398

大小:59.51 KB

页数:3页

时间:2019-03-23

案例分析题【国际商法】_第1页
案例分析题【国际商法】_第2页
案例分析题【国际商法】_第3页
资源描述:

《案例分析题【国际商法】》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库

1、一・IsthereanycontractbetweenXandY?•OnApril4,CompanyX,withitsplaceofbusinessinChina,sentanofferbye-mailtoCompanywithitsplaceofbusinessinAustralia.Theofferconcerned50,000metershand-printedcottonclothandsaiditwouldremainopenuntilApril30.OnApril10,CompanyYansweredbye-mail:"Thepric

2、eistoohigh,andwearenotinterestedintheoffer."ButonApril20,themanagerofCompanyYchangedhismindandsentanothere-mailtoaccepttheApril4offer.•Question:IsthereanycontractbetweencompanyXandCompanyY?•AnswerandAnalysis•No.SincebothChinaandAustraliaareContractingStatestotheCISG,accordingt

3、oArticle1wouldapplyhere・Afterreceivingtheofferof50,000metershand-printedcottoncloth,onApril10,CompanyYstatedthattheywerenotinterestedintheoffer,whichrejectedtheoffer.OnApril20,thee-mailsenttoaccepttheApril4offershouldberegardedasanewofferinsteadofacceptsnee.Therefore,therewasn

4、ocontractbetweenCompanyXandCompanyY.二・WORLD-WIDEVOLKSEAGENV.WOODSON•UnitedStatesSupremeCourtJ980•FACTS:TheRobinsonsboughtanewAudifromSeawayVolkswageninNewYorkstate.Whiletravel)ngthroughtheStateofOklahoma,theAudiwasrearended,causingafirewhichseverelyburnedMrs.Robinsonandhertwoc

5、hildren.•TheRobinsonssuedintort侵权行为inOklahomaversusretailerSeawayandwholesalerWorld-WideVolkswagen,bothNewYorkcorporationsthatdidnobusinessinOklahonma.Bothdefendantsenteredspecialappearancestocontestthetrialcourt'sassertionofpersonaljurisdictionoverthem;Woodsonwasthetrialjudge

6、.•ISSUE:DoestheStateofOklahomahavepersonaljurisdictionoveranautoretailerandwholesalerwhosonotsellcarsinthestate?•HOLDING:NO.•LAW:UndertheU.S.Constitution,FourteenthAmendment'sDueProcessClause,theremustbeminimumcontactsamongthedefendsnts,theforum,andtheclaimbeingmadebyplaintiff

7、sinorderforthestatecourttoexercisepersonaljurisdiction属人管辖权•EXPLANATION:PetitionerscarriedonnoactivitiesinOklahoma,performednosalesorservicesthere,anddidnotsolicitbusinesstherethroughadvertisingoragents.The"foreseeability"oftheircarsbeingdriveninOklahomaisnotenoughtohalethemin

8、tocourtthere.•ORDER:Caseagainsttheretaileranddistributorisdis

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。