颠覆形而上学和社会批判路向——尼采《权力意志》文本解读

《颠覆形而上学和社会批判路向——尼采《权力意志》文本解读》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、AbstractNietzscheisoneofthemostcontroversialphilosophers．Histhoughthascomprehensiveandprofoundimpactonthe20thcenturyWesternphilosophy．ThecentralpartofhiswholesystemofthoughtistheWilltoPower,whichisnarratedinhisoldagemanuscriptsWilltoPower．Thisarticleintends

2、tounderstandhowNietzschecriticizedtheWesterntraditionalmetaphysics，andrevaluateditthroughtheinterpretationoftheWilltoPower．Thisarticleisdividedintofourparts．ThefirsttwopartsfocusonthedeconstructionofWilltoPower,andtheothertwopartscompareNietzschewithMarx’Sc

3、riticalroadtoanalyzehisimpactonmodemChineseandWesternphilosophyThefirstpartdescribesthebackgroundoftheWilltoPowerThoughts．NietzschecalledthecrisisandtransitionofChristianitywhichisthepillarofWesterncultureas”Godisdead”，whichmeansthearrivalofnihilismandthelo

4、ssofthetraditionalmaximumvalue，whichcausespeoplecompletelylivewithoutvalue．ThusNietzscheanalyzedtheunderlyingvaluablecausesoftheproblemsoftraditionalWestemphilosophy,thatwasnihilism，andcriticizedstrictlyonthecombinationofWesternrationalisttraditionandChrist

5、ianmoralinordertoshakenthefoundationofmetaphysics．ThesecondpartistofindhowNietzscheovertumstheoldvaluesandnihilismwhentraditionalvaluesaredisappearing．Awareofthemetaphysicalcrisis，Nietzschebegantobuildhisownepistemologicalandpointedoutthattocompletelyoverco

6、methecrisisofEuropeannihilism．Weshouldchangeourvalues，destroytheoldvalueswiththenatureofthereallifeorWilltoPower,andenditwitheternalcycle．ThethirdpartcomparesNietzscheandMarx’ScriticalroadthroughtheunderstandingofDarwinism，religiousoutlook，aswellasthethreea

7、spectsoftheconceptionofhistory．Firstofall，NietzscheemphasizedthatlifecouldnotinherentadapttotheexternalenvironmentwhenhediscussedtheWilltoPower,whichgaverisetothecriticismofDarwinism；EngelsagreedwithDarwiniantheoryofevolutionandgaveapositiveattitudetowardsi

8、t．Secondly,Nietzscheadvocatedthattherewasonlyoneworld，therealityoftheexistenceoftheworldwasthewilltopower；Marxrevealedthatthetruebasisofthehistoricaldevelopmentwaspractice，andhishistoricalmaterialismth