欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:33626927
大小:1.25 MB
页数:33页
时间:2019-02-27
《内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌有效性和安全性meta分析》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、万方数据温州医学院硕士学位论文目录一、中文摘要⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯3二、英文摘要⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯4三、正文⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯51.前言⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯52.材料与方法⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯53。结果⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯64.讨论⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯85.结论⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯96.参考文献⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯
2、10四、附录⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯18五、致谢⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯19六、综述及参考文献⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯20七、学位论文独创性声明⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯29万方数据温州医学院坝I.学位论义内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌有效性和安全性的Meta分析中文摘要目的:探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)在治疗早期食管癌的有效性和安全性方面的差异。方法:检索1990年1月至2012年12月间Medline、Embase、Cochrane1ibrary、
3、万方数据库、维普数据库及中国知网数据库上发表的有关早期食管癌ESD和EMR治疗比较研究的所有中英文文献,通过纳入和排除标准筛选后最终纳入文献的效应指标,采用Revman5.1软件进行统计分析,以整块切除率、治愈性切除率、局部复发率为有效性效应指标,以穿孔、出血、狭窄和手术为安全性效应指标。结果:最终纳入8篇非随机对照回顾性队列研究。Meta分析显示,ESD组较EMR组整块切除率[98.36%(360/366)比41.79%(252/603),P4、.55%(2/366)比13.76%(83/603),P5、venessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioncomparedwithendoscopicmucosalresectionforearlyesophagealcancer:ametaanalysisAbstractObjective:ExplorethedifferencesineffectivenessandsafetybetweenEndoscopicsubmucosaldissection(ESD)andendoscopicmucosalresection(EMR)forearlyesophagealcancer化EC).6、Methods:PaperspublishedfromJanuaryl990toDecember2012inMedline,EMBASE,CochraneLibrary,Wanfang,VIPandCNKlweresearchedinEnglishandChineserespectivelytoidentifythestudiescomparingESDwithEMRforEEC.Meta—analysisforeachoutcomeoftheincludedstudiesthatwereidentifiedbytheinclusioncriteriaandtheexclus7、ioncriteriawasconductedusingsoftwareRevman5.1.Outcomemeasuresconsistedofthreeeffectiveness-relevantmeasuresfratesforenblocresection,curativeresection,localrecurrence)andfoursafety—relevantmeasures(bleeding,perforation,stricture,andoperationtime).Result:A
4、.55%(2/366)比13.76%(83/603),P5、venessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioncomparedwithendoscopicmucosalresectionforearlyesophagealcancer:ametaanalysisAbstractObjective:ExplorethedifferencesineffectivenessandsafetybetweenEndoscopicsubmucosaldissection(ESD)andendoscopicmucosalresection(EMR)forearlyesophagealcancer化EC).6、Methods:PaperspublishedfromJanuaryl990toDecember2012inMedline,EMBASE,CochraneLibrary,Wanfang,VIPandCNKlweresearchedinEnglishandChineserespectivelytoidentifythestudiescomparingESDwithEMRforEEC.Meta—analysisforeachoutcomeoftheincludedstudiesthatwereidentifiedbytheinclusioncriteriaandtheexclus7、ioncriteriawasconductedusingsoftwareRevman5.1.Outcomemeasuresconsistedofthreeeffectiveness-relevantmeasuresfratesforenblocresection,curativeresection,localrecurrence)andfoursafety—relevantmeasures(bleeding,perforation,stricture,andoperationtime).Result:A
5、venessandsafetyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectioncomparedwithendoscopicmucosalresectionforearlyesophagealcancer:ametaanalysisAbstractObjective:ExplorethedifferencesineffectivenessandsafetybetweenEndoscopicsubmucosaldissection(ESD)andendoscopicmucosalresection(EMR)forearlyesophagealcancer化EC).
6、Methods:PaperspublishedfromJanuaryl990toDecember2012inMedline,EMBASE,CochraneLibrary,Wanfang,VIPandCNKlweresearchedinEnglishandChineserespectivelytoidentifythestudiescomparingESDwithEMRforEEC.Meta—analysisforeachoutcomeoftheincludedstudiesthatwereidentifiedbytheinclusioncriteriaandtheexclus
7、ioncriteriawasconductedusingsoftwareRevman5.1.Outcomemeasuresconsistedofthreeeffectiveness-relevantmeasuresfratesforenblocresection,curativeresection,localrecurrence)andfoursafety—relevantmeasures(bleeding,perforation,stricture,andoperationtime).Result:A
此文档下载收益归作者所有