资源描述:
《认知回避问卷在中国大学生中应用的信效度》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。
1、认知回避问卷在中国大学生中应用的信效度焦克媛朱雅雯范文超周宁宁王建平北京师范大学心理学部应用实验心理北京重点实验室西北师范大学心理学院首都医科大学摘要:目的:引进认知回避问卷(CognitiveAvoidanceQuestionnaire,CAQ),并考察其在中国大学牛被试中的信效度。方法:使用经双盲翻译的中文版CAQ,对600名大学生进行施测,冋收有效问卷561份。初次施测后间隔3"周,选取91名被试进行重测。结果:验证性因素分析的结果表明屮文版CAQ符合原五因素模型(xJ494・620,df二239,x2/df=2.
2、070,RMESA二0.046,CFI二0.954,TLI=0.942,SRMR二0.042),五因素分别为:思维压抑、思维替代、转移注意、回避刺激、图像思维化。信度分析表明,总量表Cronbacha系数为0.930,各分量表Cronbacha系数介于0.732°.839之间;总量表重测信度为0.652,各分量表介于0.439°.638Z间;总量表分半信度为0.874,各分量表分半信度介于0.689°.830之间。总量表与思维压抑量表的相关系数为0.584,与抑郁、焦虑、压力、强迫量表的相关系数分别为0.247,0.31
3、6,0.354,0.396(P值均<0.01)。结论:中文版CAQ具有良好的信效度,可在中国文化下应用。关键词:认知回避;认知回避问卷;信度;效度;作者简介:王建平,wjphh@bnu.edu.cn收稿日期:2017-04-11PsychometriePropertiesoftheCognitiveAvoidanceQuestionnaireinChineseUniversityStudentsJIAOKe-yuanZHUYa-wenFANWen-chaoZHOUNing-ningWANGJian-pingBeijing
4、KeyLabofAppliedExperimentaiPsychology,FacultyofPsychology,BeijingNormalUniversity;Abstract:Objective:ToconstructaChineseversionofCognitiveAvoidanceQuestiormaire(CAQ),andtestitsreliabili-tyandvalidityinChineseuniversitystudents.Methods:600collegestudentswereaskedt
5、ocompleteabatteryofquestion-naircs,amongwhich561questiorrnaircswerefavorable.Threetofourweekslaterafterthefirsttest,91studentsweretestedagain.Results:Theresultsofconfirmatoryfactoranalysisconfinnedtheoriginalfive-factormodel(x2=494.620,df二239,x2/df=2.070,RMESA=0.
6、046,CFI=0.954,TLI=0.942,SRMR二0.042).ThefivefactorswereThoughtSuppression,ThoughtSub-stitution,Distraction,AvoidanceofThreateningStimuli,andtheTransformationofImagesintoThoughts.Cronbacha,Test-retestreliabilityandsplit-halfreliabilityofthetotalquestionnaireanddime
7、nsionswere0.732-0.930,0.439-0.652andO.689-0.874,respectively.ForthetotalscoreofChineseversionCAQ,thecorrclationcoefficientswere0-584toWBSIscore,0.247todepressionscore,0.316toanxietyscore,0.354tostressscore,0.396toOCI-Rscore,respectively.Conclusion:TheChineseversi
8、onofCAQisareliableandvalidinstrumentforassessingcognitiveavoidaneeinChineseculturedndcanbeusedforfutureresearch.Keyword:Cognitiveavoidance;CognitiveAvoidanceQu