资源描述:
《试析《双城记》中的人道主义精神---毕业论文》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、【标题】试析《双城记》中的人道主义精神【作者】陈志平【关键词】道德;人道主义;爱【指导老师】张亚军【专业】英语【正文】I.Introduction Dickens’humanitarianismfocusedonmoralityaswellasitbasedonmorality.Inhismanynovels,healldisplayedthecapitalisthumanitarianism.Headvisedpeopletobemercifulandlenient,andhewasagoodexampleofhumanitarian.Asacapitalistichu
2、manitarian,CharlesDickenssawthesocialcondemn.Healsohopedfaithfullythatthelaborscouldgetthehappylife.Butheobjectedtosolvingthesocialcondemnwiththeviolentrevolution.Therefore,heexpectedthattherulercouldreasonablyprogresssomereformofsociety,thus,thestatecouldbecomesettling.Thesocietycouldget
3、muchdevelopment.Hethoughtthattheviolentrevolutionwasaterriblecalamity;itdestroyedthesilenceofcountryandthehappinessofhome.Forinstance,inATaleofTwoCities: Hungerwasprevalenteverywhere.Hungerwaspushedoutofthetallhouses,inthewretchedclothingthathunguponpolesandlines;Hungerwaspatchedintothemw
4、ithstrawandragandwoodandpaper;Hungerwasrepeatedineveryfragmentofthesmallmodicumoffirewoodthatthemansawedoff;Hungerstareddownfromthesmokelesschimneys,andstartedupfromthefilthystreetthathadnooffal,amongitsrefuse,ofanythingtoeat.Hungerwastheinscriptiononthebaker'sshelves,writtenineverysmalll
5、oafofhisscantystockofbadbread;atthesausage-shop,ineverydead-dogpreparationthatwasofferedforsale.Hungerrattleditsdrybonesamongtheroastingchestnutsintheturnedcylinder;Hungerwasshredintoatomicsineveryfarthingporringerofhuskychipsofpotato,friedwithsomereluctantdropsofoil.1 Heshoweddeepsympat
6、hywiththepoor.HestronglycondemnedthefeudalMarquis’behavior.Andhealsoheldagreatestesteemfortheloveofthehumanbeing.Dickensbelievedlovewasalwaysmorepowerfulthanresentment.Inhisopinion,nomaterthepersonwasrichorpoor,ifhisbehavioragreedwithmorality,itshouldbeprized.Ifnot,itshouldbecriticized.Th
7、erefore,facingthecontradictionbetweenthearistocratsandthepoor,Dickensfirmlybelievedthecontradictioncouldbesolvedbythegreatloveofthehumanbeing.Inshort,theviewofDickens’humanitarianismcouldbesummarized,asthis “behumanitarianismandmorality”.CharlesDickensthoughtgovernm