资源描述:
《劳动争议申请管理仲裁时效仅有年(the limitation of application for labor dispute management is only years)》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、劳动争议申请管理仲裁时效仅有1年(Thelimitationofapplicationforlabordisputemanagementisonly1years)Beyondthelimitationofarbitration,thecourtisdifficulttosafeguardrightsAfter5years'work,anemployeewassuddenlyrelievedofthelaborcontractbythecompany.Asaresultofthework,inadditiontomonthlywages,theemployeen
2、everreceivedovertimewages,anddidnotreceivebonuses,allowances,subsidies,thecompanydidnotpaypremiumsfortheemployee.Theemployeebelievesthathehasbeenrelievedofhislaborcontractandthatthecompanyhasinfringeduponhislawfulrightsandinterests.Tothisend,thestaffsuedthecourt,requiringthecompanyt
3、opaytheircompensationandsoon,totaling123thousandand325yuan.Unexpectedly,becausethetimeexceededthelimitationoflaborarbitration,thecourtdismissedtheclaim.ZhangXiaohuawasborninJanuary28,1968,isadoublebellHukouCountytown.In2004,ZhangXiaohuawenttoworkatJiujiangZhongweiChemicalTechnologyC
4、o.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoasZhongweicompany)locatedintheJinshaIndustrialParkinthecounty.InJanuary1,2008,ZhangXiaohuasignedalaborcontractwiththecompanyfor3years.Thecontractstipulatedthattheworkquotaisthetonnagepiece,themonthlywagesnotlessthan800yuan.Inpractice,ZhangXiaohuaactualmo
5、nthlypiecewageupto2372.88yuan.AttheendofSeptember2008,thecompanyworkshopdirectorMeiYouansuddenlyorderedZhangXiaohuatoworkuntiltheendofSeptember2008.ZhangXiaohuarefusedtoaccepttherequestofthecompanytomakeawrittenexplanation,butnoresult.InJanuary17,2009,afterZhangXiaohuaofficiallyrele
6、asedthelaborcontract,heofficiallyleftthecompany.AfterZhangXiaohualeftthecompany,hethoughthehadbeenworkingforfiveyears.Hehadneverreceivedovertimepayexceptformonthlysalary.Thecompanydidnotpayhimbonus,allowanceandsubsidy,nordidhepaythesocialinsurancepremiumforhim.Thecompany'sillegaldis
7、solutionofhislaborcontractviolateshislegitimaterightsandinterests.SoZhangXiaohuasuedthecompanyandaskedthecompanytopayhiscompensationtotaling123thousandand325yuan.Notlongago,afterthecourtacceptedthecase,acollegialpanelwasformedaccordingtolaw,andthetrialwasheldinpublic.Theplaintiff'sa
8、ttorneyandtheprinci