Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA

Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA

ID:39716512

大小:138.21 KB

页数:34页

时间:2019-07-09

Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA_第1页
Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA_第2页
Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA_第3页
Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA_第4页
Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA_第5页
资源描述:

《Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、Law,FactandDiscretionintheUK,EUandtheUSA∗ProfessorPaulCraigTheelaborationandexplicationofthetestsforjudicialreviewoflaw,factanddiscretioninaparticularlegalsystemcan,asalladministrativelawyerswillknow,beacomplextask,sincethisistheverycoreofjudicialreview.Anyattempttoexplicatethetest

2、sforjudicialreviewoflaw,factanddiscretionacrossthreedifferentlegalsystemsisevenmoredifficult,buttheenterprisecanberewardingforthecomparativeinsightsthatittherebybringstotheresolutionofproblemsthatendemictoalllegalsystems.Thescaleofthetaskwillhoweverconstrainthemannerofexplication.I

3、tisclearlynotpossiblewithintheconfinesofthespaceandtimeavailablethiseveningtogiveaverydetailedanalysisofthesalientissues.Norwouldthatbeveryhelpfulfromtheperspectiveofcomparativeinsight,sinceexcessivedetailwouldmaskthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthelegalsystems.Whatfollowswillt

4、hereforenecessarilybeaschematicoverviewoftherelevantlawinrelationtoreviewoflaw,factanddiscretion,whichisdesignedtorevealthecommonalitiesanddifferencesbetweenUK,EUandUSlaw,andtherebysetthestagefordiscussionconcerningthepointsofcontactandcontrastwithFrenchlaw.11.JUDICIALREVIEW:QUESTI

5、ONSOFLAW1)Preliminary:a)Legalsystemswillcommonlydistinguishbetweenlaw,factanddiscretionforthepurposesofjudicialreview.Thenatureofthesedistinguishingcriteriacanbecontentious.Therearedifferingviews,forexample,astothecriteriaforregardinganissueasoneoflaw,asopposedtofact.Thisisanendemi

6、cprobleminalllegalsystems,andthecriteriatobefoundinanyonelegalsystemmaynotnecessarilybeappliedconsistentlybythecourts.Thecriteriafordistinguishingbetweenlawandfact,orlawanddiscretionmaymoreoverdifferasbetweenlegalsystems.Itwouldclearlybeimpossiblewithintheconfinesofthepresentdiscus

7、siontoconsiderthedetailedpositivelawforthethreesystemsunderscrutiny,sincethisintellectualexercisecouldeasilyoccupytheentiretyofthetimeatourdisposal.b)ForthepurposesofthepresentdiscussionIshallthereforedistinguishbetweenthetermslawandfactinthefollowingmanner.Theparadigminstanceoffac

8、tinvolvesadisputeastowhata

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。