tucidides woodman, rhetoric in classical historiography. four studies (in) bb外语英文电子书

《tucidides woodman, rhetoric in classical historiography. four studies (in) bb外语英文电子书》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、RHETORICINCLASSICALHISTORIOGRAPHYFOURSTUDIESA.J.WoodmanRoutledgeTaylor&FrancisGroupLONDONANDNEWYORK©1988A.J.WoodmanBritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationDataRoutledgeisanimprintoftheTaylor&FrancisGroupThiseditionpublishedintheTaylor&Francise-Library,2004.Woodman,A.J.Rhetoricin

2、classicalhistoriography1.Rome—Historiography2.Greece—HistoriographyI.Title907′.2037DG205ISBN0-7099-5256-2(PrintEdition)PublishedintheUSAin1988byAreopagiticaPressISBN0-203-48053-8Mastere-bookISBNISBN0-203-78877-X(AdobeeReaderFormat)ISBN0-918400-07-4(PrintEdition)ContentsPrologu

3、eix1.PreconceptionsandPracticalities:Thucydides1Preliminary1Preface:PartOne5PartTwo7PartThree:9Speeches11Events15Audience23ThePeloponnesianWar28Plague32Posterity402.Theory:Cicero70Introduction:theLettertoLucceiusandtheDeOratore70TheDeficienciesoftheEarlyRomanHistorians76HowHis

4、toryShouldbeWritten:78Thefoundationsofhistoriography81Thesuperstructureofhistoriography:83Content83Style94AlternativeDefinitions:95Historiographyandepideictic95Historiographyandpoetry983.StyleandAttitude:SallustandLivy117Sallust:Cicero’s‘natureofstyle’117ThereactionofSallust12

5、0Declineanddissent124Livy:Preface128Theearlybooks134TheAugustanhistorian136InfluenceofSallustandLivy1404.HistoryandAlternativeHistories:Tacitus160PrefacetotheHistories160ContentsBook1oftheAnnals:167Preface(Chapter1)167TheGermancampaignsofAD15:168Thestory169The‘inuentio’ofthest

6、ory176Book4oftheAnnals:180Programmaticelements180Metahistory1865.Epilogue197AbbreviationsandBibliography216GeneralIndex228IndexofPassages234viToDorothyfictauoluptatiscausasintproximauerisPrologueNodiscussionofclassicalhistoriographycanproceedveryfarbeforeencounteringthetwocont

7、radictorybeliefswhichR.F.AtkinsonmentionsinhisbookKnowledgeandExplanationinHistory(1978):Fromoutsideonetendstothinkofhistoryascontinuingfromclassicaltimestothepresentday;butmanyprofessionalhistoriansseemrathertothinkthattheirsubjectunderwentamajorchangearoundthebeginningofthen

8、ineteenthcentury.Itmayevenbethoughtthathistory‘proper’beganab