大学英语精读4-lesson3-text-appreciation.ppt

《大学英语精读4-lesson3-text-appreciation.ppt》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、PartThreeTextAppreciationENTERTextAppreciationI.TextAnalysis1.Style2.StylisticFeature3.Theme4.Structure5.FurtherDiscussionII.WritingDeviceExpositionIII.SentenceParaphraseContentsThisisapieceofexpositorywriting.Thepurposeofexpositorywritingistoexplainortogivethereaderinformationtohelphimunderstandt

2、heworldaroundhim.TextAnalysisForreferenceStyleTheendofStyle.TextAnalysisPleasefindsupportingdetailsinthetext.TheendofStylisticFeature.StylisticFeature1.longsentences2.formalwords3.impersonalstructuresTextAnalysisInthisessaythetwoauthorsdiscussthedefinitionofhistory,theroleofthehistoriansandthereas

3、onswhyhistoriansdisagree.ThemeTheendofTheme.TextAnalysisStructureTheendofStructure.PartI(Paras.1—3)PartII(Paras.4—10)PartIII(Paras.11—13)Theauthorssummarizethereasonswhyhistoriansdisagreeandthedisagreementiseverlasting.HowthestudentsofhistorymajorstudyhistoryandwhatconfusethemHistoriansmayviewthes

4、amehistoricaleventfromdifferentperspectivesTextAnalysisWhatarethethreedefinitionsofhistory?Tobecontinuedonthenextpage.inthebroadestsensethewholeofthehumanpastinarestrictedsenseinacommonsensetherecordedpartofhumanlifewhathistorianswriteaboutthepastTextAnalysisWhatistheroleofthehistorians?Tobecont

5、inuedonthenextpage.Historiansdonotjustcollectfacts.Theygivemeaningtothefacts.TextAnalysisWhydohistoriansdisagree?Becausehistorianshavedifferentinterestsandadifferentunderstandingofhumanmotivationandhumanbehaviorwhichinturnisduetotheirdifferentbackgroundinage,sex,race,class,education,religion,polit

6、ics,etc.,theytendnotonlytobeinterestedindifferentfactsbutalsointerpretthesamefactsdifferently.Tobecontinuedonthenextpage.TextAnalysisHistoryisjustthefactsofnames,datesandstatisticsofthepast.Thestudyofhistoryisthestudyofthese“facts”aboutthepast.Tobecontinuedonthenextpage.Question:Whatisthemisunde

7、rstandingtheauthorsaretryingtoclarifyinPara.1?TextAnalysisQuestion:WhatistheconfusionofthestudentsputforwardinParas.2-3?Historianswhoarewrongmayhavetheir“facts”correct.Contendinghistoriansmoreorlessagreeonthesam