欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:5326818
大小:339.09 KB
页数:6页
时间:2017-12-08
《半番鸭网床平养与地面平养对比试验》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、福建农业学报28(10):947~952,2013Fuj;ianJournalofAgriculturalSciences文章编号:1008-0384(2013)1O一947一O6陈岩锋,梁阿政,孙世坤,等.半番鸭网床平养与地面平养对比试验[J].福建农业学报,2013,28(1O):947—952.CHENY-F,LIANGA—Z,SUNS-K,eta1.ComparatiVeExperimentofMu1eDuckRearingonNettingBedandGround[J].Fuji口JournalofAgriculturalSciences,2013,28(
2、1O):947—952.半番鸭网床平养与地面平养对比试验陈岩锋,梁阿政,孙世坤,庄晓东,陈冬金,朱志明,桑雷,谢喜平(1.福建省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所,福建福州350013;2.漳州昌龙农牧有限公司,福建漳州363118)摘要:为探讨半番鸭网床饲养效果,将大型白羽半番鸭采用网床平养与地面平养2种饲养方式进行对比试验,分析其生产性能、屠宰性能、肌肉品质、血清生化指标和经济效益。结果表明:网床平养组平均每只净增重比地面平养组多119.87g(3.90%)(PO.05);血清生
3、化指标中,白蛋白、直接胆红素、肌酸激酶、二氧化碳和载脂蛋白B2组间差异显著(P4、g—jin,ZHUZhi—ming。SANGLei.XIEXi—ping(1.InstituteofAnimalHusbandryandVeterinaryMedicine,FujianAcademyofAgriculturalSciences,Fuzhou,Fujian350013,China;2.ChanglongAgricultureandAnimalHusbandryCo.,Ltd.,Zhangzhou,FujJan363l18,China)Abstract:Throughthecomparisontestonlargewhite-plumagemuledu5、ckrearinginnettingbedandOnground,theproductionperformance,slaughterperformance,meatquality,serumbiochemicalindiecesandeconomicbenefitofducksweremeasured.Theresultsshowedthattheaveragenetgainofeachduckrearinginnettingbedwashigherthantheduckrearingongroundby119.87g(3.90)(P<0.05).Twobreed6、ingpatternshadnosignificantdifferenceinfeedconversion.survivalrate,slaughterperformanceandmeatquality(P>0.05).Thereweresignificantdifferencesinalbumin,directbilirubin,creatinekinase,carbondioxideandapolipoproteinB(P7、nsferase,isoenzymicCK—MB,lactatedehydrogenase,hydr0xybutyratedehydrogenaseandsodium(P<:0.01).Insummary,thefeedingefficiencyinnettingofduckrearinginnettingbedishigherthanduckrearingonground.Keywords:muleduck;rearinginnettingbed;rearingonground;productionperformance;biochemicalindex;ec
4、g—jin,ZHUZhi—ming。SANGLei.XIEXi—ping(1.InstituteofAnimalHusbandryandVeterinaryMedicine,FujianAcademyofAgriculturalSciences,Fuzhou,Fujian350013,China;2.ChanglongAgricultureandAnimalHusbandryCo.,Ltd.,Zhangzhou,FujJan363l18,China)Abstract:Throughthecomparisontestonlargewhite-plumagemuledu
5、ckrearinginnettingbedandOnground,theproductionperformance,slaughterperformance,meatquality,serumbiochemicalindiecesandeconomicbenefitofducksweremeasured.Theresultsshowedthattheaveragenetgainofeachduckrearinginnettingbedwashigherthantheduckrearingongroundby119.87g(3.90)(P<0.05).Twobreed
6、ingpatternshadnosignificantdifferenceinfeedconversion.survivalrate,slaughterperformanceandmeatquality(P>0.05).Thereweresignificantdifferencesinalbumin,directbilirubin,creatinekinase,carbondioxideandapolipoproteinB(P7、nsferase,isoenzymicCK—MB,lactatedehydrogenase,hydr0xybutyratedehydrogenaseandsodium(P<:0.01).Insummary,thefeedingefficiencyinnettingofduckrearinginnettingbedishigherthanduckrearingonground.Keywords:muleduck;rearinginnettingbed;rearingonground;productionperformance;biochemicalindex;ec
7、nsferase,isoenzymicCK—MB,lactatedehydrogenase,hydr0xybutyratedehydrogenaseandsodium(P<:0.01).Insummary,thefeedingefficiencyinnettingofduckrearinginnettingbedishigherthanduckrearingonground.Keywords:muleduck;rearinginnettingbed;rearingonground;productionperformance;biochemicalindex;ec
此文档下载收益归作者所有