资源描述:
《【金版学案】高二人教版英语必修五练习:Unit1第五学时Writing》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。
1、第五学时Writing话题徽写作丿个人情况一一伟大的科学家【写作素材】提示:黑体部分用本单元词汇表达。1.居里夫人出生于波兰华沙(Warsaw),年轻时来到巴黎读大学,在这里遇到了她的丈夫皮埃尔•居里(PieireCurie)o答案:MarieCuriewasborninWarsawPoland,shewenttoattendcollegeinParisasayounglady,whereshemetherhusbandPierreCurie.2.他们共同全神贯注于放射性物质的研究,最终发现了镭和针(polonium)
2、两种放射性元素。1903年,他们获得了诺贝尔物理学奖。答案:Theyweretogetherabsorbedintheresearchintoradioactivematter,whichledtothediscoveryofpoloniumandradium.In1903,theyweregiventheNobelPrizeforPhysics.3・在丈夫去世后,她继续工作,于1911年获得诺贝尔化学奖。答案:Afterherhusband'sdeathsshewentonworkingandwontheNobelP
3、rizeforChemistryin1911.4.居里夫人为科学的发展做出了杰出的贡献,但金钱和名声对她来说毫无意义。答案:MarieCuriemadegreatcontributionstothedevelopmentofscience,butmoneyandreputationmadenosensetoher.【连句成篇】可选用born短语作状语,定语从句,leadto,but等将以上句子连成一篇短文。答案:BorninWarsawPoland,MarieCuriewenttoattendcollegeinPari
4、sasayounglady,whereshemetherhusbandPierreCurie.Theyweretogetherabsorbedintheresearchintoradioactivematter,whichledtothediscoveryofpoloniumandradium.In1903,theyweregiventheNobelPrizeforPhysics.Afterherhusband'sdeath,shewentonworkingandwontheNobelPrizeforChemistry
5、in1911.MarieCuriemadegreatcontributionstothedevelopmentofscience,butmoneyandreputationmadenosensetoher.【短文改错】假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文,请你修改你同桌写的以下作文。文中共有10处语言错误,每处错误仅涉及一个单词的增加、删除或修改。增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(人),并在其下面写出该加的词。删除:把多余的词用斜线⑴划掉。修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。注意:1•每处错误及其修改
6、均仅限一词。2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。Certainlyhewasrighttocareful・TheChristianChurchrejectedhistheory,saiditwasagainstGod'sideaandpeoplewhichsupporteditwouldbeattacked・YetCopernicus*theoryisnowthebasisinwhichallourideasoftheuniversearebuilt.HistheorywasreplacedtheChri
7、stianideaofgravity,whichsaysthingsfelltoearthbecauseofGodcreatedtheearthasthecentreofauniverse・Copernicusshowedthiswasobviouswrong・NowpeoplecanseethatthereisadirectionlinkbetweenhertheoryandtheworkofIsaacNewton,AlbertEinsteinandStephenHawking.A答案:Certainlyhewasr
8、ightto肚careful.TheChristiansaidChurchrejectedhistheory,:—itwasagainstGod'sideaandJ"sayingpeople评曲supporteditwouldbeattacked.YetCopernicus*theoryinisnowthebasis—whicha