资源描述：
《Quantifying the consensus onanthropogenic global warming in thescientific literature量化共识 人类活动的全球变暖 科学文献》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、EnvironmentalResearchLettersLETTER•OPENACCESSRelatedcontent-Consensusonconsensus:asynthesisofQuantifyingtheconsensusonanthropogenicconsensusestimatesonhuman-causedglobalwarmingglobalwarminginthescientificliteratureJohnCook,NaomiOreskes,PeterTDoranetal.-HistoryandfutureofthescientificTocitethisa
2、rticle:JohnCooketal2013Environ.Res.Lett.8024024consensusonanthropogenicglobalwarmingFritzReusswig-Commenton‘QuantifyingtheconsensusonanthropogenicglobalwarmingintheViewthearticleonlineforupdatesandenhancements.scientificliterature’RichardSJTolRecentcitations-RichardTuckett-Inconsensuswetrust?Pe
3、rsuasiveeffectsofscientificconsensuscommunicationSedonaChinnetal-StevanE.HobfollThiscontentwasdownloadedfromIPaddress183.158.90.254on07/08/2018at07:42IOPPUBLISHINGENVIRONMENTALRESEARCHLETTERSEnviron.Res.Lett.8(2013)024024(7pp)doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024Quantifyingtheconsensusonanthropogeni
4、cglobalwarminginthescientificliteratureJohnCook1,2,3,DanaNuccitelli2,4,SarahAGreen5,MarkRichardson6,BarbelWinkler¨2,RobPainting2,RobertWay7,PeterJacobs8andAndrewSkuce2,91GlobalChangeInstitute,UniversityofQueensland,Australia2SkepticalScience,Brisbane,Queensland,Australia3SchoolofPsychology,Unive
5、rsityofWesternAustralia,Australia4TetraTech,Incorporated,McClellan,CA,USA5DepartmentofChemistry,MichiganTechnologicalUniversity,USA6DepartmentofMeteorology,UniversityofReading,UK7DepartmentofGeography,MemorialUniversityofNewfoundland,Canada8DepartmentofEnvironmentalScienceandPolicy,GeorgeMasonU
6、niversity,USA9SaltSpringConsultingLtd,SaltSpringIsland,BC,CanadaE-mail:j.cook3@uq.edu.auReceived18January2013Acceptedforpublication22April2013Published15May2013Onlineatstacks.iop.org/ERL/8/024024AbstractWeanalyzetheevolutionofthescientificconsensusonanthropogenicglobalwarming(AGW)inthepeer-revie
7、wedscientificliterature,examining11944climateabstractsfrom1991–2011matchingthetopics‘globalclimatechange’or‘globalwarming’.Wefindthat66.4%ofabstractsexpressednopositiononAGW,32.6%endorsedAGW,0.7%rejectedAGWand0.3%wereuncertainaboutt
