无过失侵权因受害人重大过失免责制度研究

《无过失侵权因受害人重大过失免责制度研究》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、对外经济贸易大学硕士学位论文无过失侵权因受害人重大过失免责制度研究姓名：赵晖申请学位级别：硕士专业：法律指导教师：苏号朋20060901AbstractX1009596Thecomparativenegligenceresponsibilityturnsovertotheresponsibilityprirlcipledoesnotconsiderthebehaviorof血esubjectivemistake，butonlyhastheriskbyitsbehaviortotakewhetherundertakestheresponsibilityjudgmentstandard

2、．Therefore．thecomparativenegligenceresponsibilitytI脚OVeⅢ"totheresponsibilityprinciplewhetherhasdisobeysthe鼬justlegalspi血isalwaysthedisputetopicbylegalth,otists．AsTrafficsafetylawpromulgates，thisdisputeisincreasinglyintense，andaffectstotheentiresociety．TbJsarticleattemptstoobtaintheeffectwhichm

3、akesuptothecomparativenegligencemspomibilitysystemflaw,byresearchingreasonsfoucotmterargumentsofvictimgrossnegligenceofthecomparativenegligenceresponsibilitysystem，．Thesocialvalueoocnrswhichfromthefairjustlegalwalueandthepreventionharmembarks，theauthoradvocatedthegrossnegligencerecognizingstan

4、dardshouldbe：Whetherviolatesthebegingingofattentionvoluntaryofaordinaryperson，alsowhetherviolatesthepersonneglientofattentionduty．Whilerecognizethegrossnegligencestandard，wemustconsiderthescienceandtechnologydevelopment，thesafeeducationthoroughandthemassivepolicewamsymbolfactorswhichispossible

5、tothebehaviorinfluence．Inordertomaketherecognizingofgrossnegligencewithscientificnatureandtheobjectivity,theauthorproposes：establishsnegligenceappraisalsystem,establishsciviljuryrecognizingnegligencesystemandexpandstheforcesliabilityinsurancescope，establishestheforcesliabilityinsurancetothedan

6、gerousactivitycomprehensively．Keywords：Comparativenegligence,Grossnegligence，ReasonsfouCounterarguments，Aprimafaciedutyofcare2Writtenby：ZhaoHulDirectedby：SuHaopeng无过失侵权责任制度中的受害人重大过失免寅事由研究无过失侵权责任中因受害人重大过失免责制度研究引言无过失侵权责任中因受害人重大过失免责中重大过失的认定问题是笔者在工作中常在思考的一个问题。由于传统侵权行为法不区分故意和过失，就更何况过失中的重大过失了。由此导致至今

7、理论界对重大过失的研究仍较为鲜见。近年来的立法和司法解释中引入了许多重大过失的概念。但由于理论研究的缺乏导致法官在审判此类案件时对重大过失的认定标准缺乏统一的尺度，造成许多消极影响。《道路交通安全法》实施后，社会各界对无过失责任是否有违正义，引发了激烈的争议。理论界有必要重新审视无过失责任制度的合理性。我一直有这样的观点：1、“重大过失”的概念往往与“故意”同时出现在法律条文中，因此在法条的设计上，体现了重大过失和故意在法律的非难性上是相近似的立法精神，因此在认定重大