资源描述：
《019920831X.Oxford.University.Press.USA.The.Possibility.of.Knowledge.May.2007》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、THEPOSSIBILITYOFKNOWLEDGEThispageintentionallyleftblankThePossibilityofKnowledgeQUASSIMCASSAMCLARENDONPRESS·OXFORD1GreatClarendonStreet,Oxfordox26dpOxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford.ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,schola
2、rship,andeducationbypublishingworldwideinOxfordNewYorkAucklandCapeTownDaresSalaamHongKongKarachiKualaLumpurMadridMelbourneMexicoCityNairobiNewDelhiShanghaiTaipeiTorontoWithofficesinArgentinaAustriaBrazilChileCzechRepublicFranceGreeceGuatemalaHungaryItalyJapanPolandPortu
3、galSingaporeSouthKoreaSwitzerlandThailandTurkeyUkraineVietnamOxfordisaregisteredtrademarkofOxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountriesPublishedintheUnitedStatesbyOxfordUniversityPressInc.,NewYork©QuassimCassam2007ThemoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenassertedData
4、baserightOxfordUniversityPress(maker)Firstpublished2007Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthepriorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermittedbylaw,orunderter
5、msagreedwiththeappropriatereprographicsrightsorganization.EnquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeoftheaboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,attheaddressaboveYoumustnotcirculatethisbookinanyotherbindingorcoverandyoumustimposethesameconditio
6、nonanyacquirerBritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationDataDataavailableLibraryofCongressCataloginginPublicationDataDataavailableTypesetbyLaserwordsPrivateLimited,Chennai,IndiaPrintedinGreatBritainonacid-freepaperbyBiddlesLtd.,King’sLynn,NorfolkISBN978–0–19–920831–9135791
7、08642PrefaceThisbookisabouthow-possiblequestionsinepistemology.Ahow-possiblequestionaskshowsomethingis,orwas,possible.Suchquestionsaren’tnecessarilyphilosophical.StudentsofBritishpoliticsmightwon-derhowitwaspossibleforJohnMajortobecomePrimeMinisterin1990butthisisaquest
8、ionforhistoriansandpoliticalscientistsratherthanforphilosophers.Thehow-possiblequestionsthatareofphilosophicalinteres
