2004年美国总统竞选辩论的评价理论阐释

《2004年美国总统竞选辩论的评价理论阐释》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、西南交通大学硕士研究生学位论文第1页Chapter1IntroductionThisthesisintendstoexplorethefactorsofthesuccessfulpersuasioninPd22erlcantelevisedpresidentialdebateswiththehelpofMartin’SAppraisal1system．Itincludesfivechapters．Inthischapter，therearesixparts：researchbackground；literaturereview；theoreticalframework

2、；introductionto2004Americanpresidentialdebates；purpose，methodandsignificance；layoutofthisthesis．蟹。置ResearchbackgroundAsweallknow,Systemic—FunctionalLinguistics(hereafterSFL)wasputforwardbyHallidayintheearlyyearsof1960s．ItislargelybasedonFirth’Ssystem—structuretheoryandowesmanyideastothe

3、PragueSch001．AccordingtOSFL，therearethreemeta-functionsoflanguage，namely,ideationalfunction，interpersonalfunction，andtextualfunction．Theinterpersonalfunctionistheparticipatoryfunctionoflanguage．Thespeakerpositionshimselfintothecontextofsituation，expressinghisownattitudes，judgmentsandsee

4、kingtoinfluencetheattitudesandbehaviorsofothers．Itexpressestheroleofrelationshipassociatedwiththesituation．Intheclause，theinterpersonalfunctionisrepresentedbymood，modalityandadverbialsetc．However，beforeAppraisaltheory，thereisnotasystematicandcompletetheorywhichinterpretshowaspeakerexpre

5、sseshisattitudesandstancesandhowheshowsfeelings，judgmentshemakesandthevalueheplacesonvariousphenomenaofhisexperience(Martin，2000)．White(1998)employsthetheoryfirstinhisdissertationonnewsreporting．Bydiscussion，Whiteoffersnewinsightsintotheparadoxofthenewsitemasthesupposedlyvalue—free，fact

6、ualtexttypewhichisinscribed，nevertheless，withideologicalperspectives．ThenMartin(2001)appliesthistheorytothepopularmusicjournals．AndhefindsthattheperfectwordsareusedtopersuadecustomerstobuyCDs．In2004，MartinanalyzesHongKonglifestylemagazinetoexplorewriter’Sattitudes．Afterwards，moreandmore

7、researchersapplyAppraisaltheory’Inordertoavoidconfusion．theauthorwillcapitalizethefirstletterofeachtermsuchasAttitude．Engagement．Graduation．etc．西南交通大学硕士研究生学位论文第2页tovariousdiscourses．Researchersexploretheliteracyreqmrementsofthediscoursesofscience(Veel，1998)，themedia(White，2003)