Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf

Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf

ID:33890404

大小:1.48 MB

页数:23页

时间:2019-03-01

Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf_第1页
Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf_第2页
Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf_第3页
Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf_第4页
Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf_第5页
资源描述:

《Brison, Speech, Harm, and the Mind-Body Problem in First Amendment Jurisprudence.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、LegalTheory,4(1998),39-61.PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmericaCopyright©CambridgeUniversityPress1352-3252/98$9.50SPEECH,HARM,ANDTHEMIND-BODYPROBLEMINFIRSTAMENDMENTJURISPRUDENCESusanJ.BrisonInstituteForAdvancedStudyandDartmouthCollegeI."Sticksandstoneswillbr

2、eakmybones,"JusticeScaliapronouncedfromthebenchinoralargumentsinSchenckv.Pro-ChoiceNetwork,"butwordscanneverhurtme.That'stheFirstAmendment,"headded.JayAlanSekulow,thelaw-yerforthepetitioners,anti-abortionprotesterswhohadbeenenjoinedfrommovingcloserthanfi

3、fteenfeetawayfromthoseenteringanabortionfacility,wasobviouslypleasedbythischaracterizationoftherighttofreespeech,re-plying,"That'scertainlyourpositiononit,andthatisexactlycorrect...""Andyourpoint,"Scaliacontinued,"isthatthey'veneverusedsticksorstones."Se

4、kulow:"Nottheseclients."Scalia:"No."Amomentlater,however,oneofthejusticesinterjected,"Butifinfact,comingrightnexttoaperson,rightintheirface,screamingatthemandsoforth,doesphysicallyhurtthem,thenit'slikeastickorstone,"towhichSekulowassented."And,"JusticeBr

5、eyeradded,"ifpressingaroundthemandsoforthhurtsthemasthey'regoingintoamedicalprocedure,thenit'slikeastickorstone,"whichSekulowalsoconceded,addingthathisclientswerenotchallengingtheinjunctionagainst1crowding.Thisarticlewasfirstpresentedasaninvitedlectureat

6、theDecember1996meetingoftheEasternDivisionoftheAmericanPhilosophicalAssociationinAtlanta.AcommentaryonthetalkwaspresentedbyFrederickSchauer,towhomIamindebtedformanyhelpfulsuggestions.IwouldalsoliketothankAnnBumpus,MargotUvesey,andThomasTrezise,whogavemei

7、nsightfulcommentsonearlierdrafts.1.PaulSchenckandDwightSaunders,Petitionersv.Pro-ChoiceNetworkofWesternNewYork,etal.No.95-1065.UnitedStatesSupremeCourtOfficialTranscriptWednesday,October16,1996.1996LW608239(U.S.OralArg.),at23.AlthoughitisthepolicyoftheSu

8、premeCourtnottoidentifywhichjusticeposeswhichquestions,sincetheyareostensiblyposedbytheCourtasawhole,thecontextoftenmakesclearwhothequestioneris.And,whereitdoesnot,reporters,suchasNationalPublicRadio'sNinaTotenberg,sometim

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。