从操纵论看《大卫·科波菲尔》两译本

《从操纵论看《大卫·科波菲尔》两译本》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、AbstractDavidCopperfield,anEnglishrealisticnovelwrittenbyCharlesDickens,enjoysagreatliteraryvalueinresearch.Ithasbeentranslatedintomanylanguagesandexertedaremarkableinfluenceinthedevelopmentofworldliterature.ThetranslatedtextbyLinShuandZhangGuruoarethesignificanton

2、estoanalyzeamongChineseversions.ThisthesisattemptstocomparethetwoChineseversionsrespectivelybyLinShuandZhangGuruofromtheperspectiveofAndreLefevere‟smanipulationtheory.Itdefinestranslationasaprocessofrewritingwherecultural-socialelementsincertainperiodmanipulatetheo

3、utput.Beingthetranslators,LinShuandZhangGuruoadopteddifferenttranslationstrategies,andfinallyledtothegreatdistinctionsoftheimagesofthetwoChineseversions,whichareofgreatpopularityamongdifferenttargetreaders.Thethesisendeavorstoprovideacomprehensiveanalysisonthetwove

4、rsionsabouttheideology,poeticsandpatronageconcerned.ThefirstchapterintroducesthebackgroundofCharlesDickensandhisnovelDavidCopperfield.Abriefreviewoftheresearchresultsonthetranslationofthisnovelismentionedtoo.ThesecondchapterinvolvestheintroductionofLefevere‟sthreem

5、ainconstraintsofmanipulationtheoryandtherelationsbetweentheseconstraintsandthetranslationofliterature.Itiscomparativeanalysisoftheconstraintsofdifferentdominantideologiesandindividualideologiesinchapterthree.Itstatesthemanipulationofideologyfromtheaspectsofpolitica

6、lideology,socialcultureandethnicsandreligiousfactors.TheseideologicalfactorsindifferenthistoricalperiodsleadLinShuandZhangGuruowithdifferentaimsintranslationtotakedifferenttranslatedmethods.Italsodemonstratesthemanipulationofindividualideologiesfromtheaspectofchoic

7、esabouttranslatedmaterial.Thechapterfourinquiresaboutthepoetologicalelementsinthetwoversions.Itattemptstodemonstratemanipulationofpoeticsfromtheaspectsofchoiceofwords,sentencestructure,itranslationdescriptioningenre,etc.throughthecomparativeanalysisofthedifferentma

8、inpoetics.Inchapterfive,ittriestoanalyzetheelementsofpatronage.Itcanbeseenthatthepublishingagencyandcensorshipsofpublicationwouldinfluencethelite