欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:32846959
大小:2.45 MB
页数:40页
时间:2019-02-16
《肝气虚失眠症机理探讨及大补肝汤临床疗效观察》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、提要目的:通过对肝气虚型失眠症的病因病机探讨及大补肝汤的临床疗效观察,验证大补肝汤治疗失眠症的临床适用性。方法:本研究从临床上选择符合纳入标准的肝气虚型失眠症患者60例,随机分为两组,即治疗组(大补肝汤组)30例,对照组(甜梦胶囊组)30例,分别给予相应药物进行临床治疗,疗程均为3周。观察患者治疗前后PSQI量表、中医症候评分的变化。结果:经过统计学分析,治疗前两组在一般资料包括年龄、性别、PSQI积分、中医症候评分等方面无明显统计学差异,具有可比性。治疗后两组均较前有所改善,但治疗组在改善中医症候方面优于对照组。1.按照《中药新药临床研究指导原则》标准评价的临床疗效比较,治疗组总有效率为9
2、3.33%,对照组总有效率为73.33%,两组临床疗效之间有显著性差异(PC0.01)。2.按照PSQI改善率评价疗效比较,治疗组愈显率63.33%,总有效率90%;对照组愈显率20.00%,总有效率76.67%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(尸<0.05)。3.在PSQI总分及各成分积分比较方面,两组总体疗效比较差异有统计学意义,治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:大补肝汤具有良好的镇静安神作用,能有效改善患者的失眠症状,对四肢倦怠、恐疑不安、脘痞胁痛等伴随症状也有明显的疗效,证明大补肝汤组方严谨科学,治疗肝气虚型失眠症具有较好的临床疗效。关键词失眠症;肝气虚;大补肝汤;临床观察Liv
3、erqideficiencyinsomniaMechanismandClinicalResearchontheTreatmentofInsomniaWithDa-Bu-GanTangDecoctionSpeciality:NeurologicalmedicineofTCM?Author:GaoYanTutor:Prof.WangZhonglinAbstractObjective:DeficiencythepathogenesisofDa-Bu-GanTangclinicalobservation,thatitsclinicalapplicabilityofthetreatmentofins
4、omnia.Methods:ChoosefromaclinicalstudymettheinclusioncriteriaoftheLiverQiDeficiency60patientswererandomlydividedintotwogroups,namelythetreatmentgroup30patientsinthecontrolgroup30cases,respectively,giventheappropriatedrugforclinicaltreatmentcourseof3weeks.BeforeandaftertreatmentPSQIscale,clinicalsym
5、ptomsscorechanges.Results:Afterstatisticalanalysis,beforetreatmentinthegeneralinformationincludingage,gender,PSQIpointsandsonosignificantdifference,comparable.Aftertreatmenthasimprovedthanbefore,butthetreatmentgroupinimprovingsymptomsintraditionalChinesemedicinethanthecontrolgroup.1.Accordingto"Chi
6、neseherbalmedicineclinicalresearchguidingprincipleoftheclinicalcurativeeffectofstandardevaluationcomparison,thetotaleffectiverateofthetreatmentgroupandcontrolgrouptotaleffectivenessis93.33%、73.33%,betweentwogroupsofclinicalcurativeeffectwassignificantdifference(p<0.01).2.ComparePSQIperiodinaccordan
7、cewith,andthetherapeuticevaluationandgreater63.33%,withthetotaleffectiverateof90%;Thecontrolgroup,thetotaleffectiverateofexplicit20.00%、76.67%;Twogroupswasstatisticallysignificanteffectcomparativedifference
此文档下载收益归作者所有