二种不同方式治疗盆腔淤血综合征的临床观察

《二种不同方式治疗盆腔淤血综合征的临床观察》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、二种不同方式治疗盆腔淤血综合征的临床观水丽君姚玮刘浏卫兵(安徽医科大学第二附属医院妇产科安徽合肥230601)【摘要】目的探讨阴道低频电脉冲刺激盆底肌肉治疗盆腔淤血综合征临床疗效。方法选择木院2011年2月-2012年6月门诊的盆腔淤血综合征患者40例，随机分为研宄组和对照组，各20例。研究组20例患者给予阴道低频电脉冲刺激盆底肌肉，对照组20例患者仅给予中药灌肠加常规紫外线微波治疗，治疗一个月后观察两组治疗效果，采用超声观察两组治疗前后盆腔静脉内径及静脉血流速度。结果研宄组治愈率及有效率明显高于对照组，组间比较，差异有统计学意义(

2、P<0.05)；治疗后两组盆腔静脉内径均较治疗前减小，静脉血流速度较治疗前增快；但研究组盆腔静脉内径小于对照组，静脉血流速度快于对照组,组间比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴道低频电脉冲刺激盆底肌肉治疗盆腔淤血综合征疗效明显优于传统微波加灌肠治疗，值得临床推广。【关键词】盆腔淤血综合征低频电脉冲盆底中药灌肠【中图分类号】R71【文献标识码】A【文章编号】2095-1752(2014)02-00392-02ClinicalobservationofVaginallowfrequencyelectricalsti

3、mulationonpelvicfloormusclesandtraditionalChinesemedicineenemaintreatmentofpelviccongestionsyndrome.SHUILi-jun,YAOWei,WEIBing.DepartmentofObstetricsandGynecology,theSecondAffiliatedHospitalofAnhuiMedicalUniversity,Hefei,Anhui230601,China.[Abstract]ObjectiveToinvestigat

4、etheclinicalefficacyofvaginallowfrequencyelectricalstimulationonpelvicfloormusclescombinedintreatmentofpelviccongestionsyndrome(PCS).Methods40PCSpatientsfromAugust2010toJune2012inourhospitalwereselectedandrandomlydividedintostudygroupandthecontrolgroup,20casesineachgro

5、up.The20patientsofstudygroupweregivenvaginallowfrequencyelectricalstimulationonpelvicfloormuscles,20patientsofthecontrolgroupwereonlygiventraditionalChinesemedicineenemaandconventionalultravioletmicrowavetreatment.Treatmenteffectwereobservedafteronemonthoftreatment,inn

6、erdiameterofpelvicveinsandvenousbloodflowvelocitybeforeandaftertreatmentweredetectedbyultrasound.ResultsThecurerateandeffectiverateoftheresearchgroupwassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup,thedifferencewasstatisticallysignificant(P<0.05);Aftertreatment,innerdiametero

7、fpelvicveindecreases,venousflowratebecamefaster;butinnerdiameterofpelvicveinofstudygroupwasshorterthanthecontrolgroup,thevenousflowwasfasterthanthecontrolgroup,thedifferencewasstatisticallysignificant(P<0.05).ConclusionTheclinicalefficacyofvaginallowfrequencyelectri

8、calstimulationonpelvicfloormusclesintreatmentofpelviccongestionsyndrome(PCS)issignificantlybetterthanthetraditionalmi