清华考研阅读讲义

清华考研阅读讲义

ID:15304839

大小:139.50 KB

页数:26页

时间:2018-08-02

清华考研阅读讲义_第1页
清华考研阅读讲义_第2页
清华考研阅读讲义_第3页
清华考研阅读讲义_第4页
清华考研阅读讲义_第5页
资源描述:

《清华考研阅读讲义》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库

1、清华大学考研辅导强化班课程讲义(bymistysky)清华大学考研辅导强化班课程《英语阅读理解》清华大学外语学院吴霞主讲PartI英语阅读考试简介1.《大纲》要求2.形式5篇文章,各500字左右,后附4小题,共20小题,40分 PartII文章体裁1.结论说明型Passage1Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithotheraspectsofculture.ThinkofGalileo’s17th-centurytrialforhisrebellingbel

2、iefbeforetheCatholicChurchorpoetWilliamBlake'sharshremarksagainstthemechanisticworldviewofIsaacNewton.Theschismbetweenscienceandthehumanitieshas,ifanything,deepenedinthiscentury.Untilrecently,thescientificcommunitywassopowerfulthatitcouldaffordtoignorei

3、tscritics-butnolonger.Asfundingforsciencehasdeclined,scientistshaveattacked"anti-science"inseveralbooks,notablyhighersuperstition,byPaulR.Gross,abiologistattheUniversityofVirginia,andNormanLeavitt,amathematicianatRutgersUniversity;andThedemon-Hauntedwor

4、ld,byCarlSaganofCornellUniversity.Defendersofsciencehavealsovoicedtheirconcernsatmeetingsuchas"TheFlightfromScienceandReason,"heldinNewYorkCityin1995,and"ScienceintheAgeof(Mis)information,"whichassembledlastJunenearbuffalo.Anti-scienceclearlymeansdiffer

5、entthingstodifferentpeople.GrossandLeavittfindfaultprimarilywithsociologists,philosophersandotheracademicswhohavequestionedscience'sobjectivity.Saganismoreconcernedwiththosewhobelieveinghosts,creationismandotherphenomenathatcontradictthescientificworldv

6、iew.Asurveyofnewsstoriesin1996revealsthattheanti-sciencetaghasbeenattachedtomanyothergroupsaswell,fromauthoritieswhoadvocatedtheeliminationofthelastremainingstocksofsmallpoxvirustoRepublicanswhoadvocateddecreasedfundingforbasicresearch.Fewwoulddisputeth

7、atthetermappliestotheUnabomber,whosemanifesto,publishedin1995,scornsscienceandlongsforreturntoapre-technologicalutopia.Butsurelythatdoesnotmeanenvironmentalistsconcernedaboutuncontrolledindustrialgrowthareanti-science,asanessayinUSNews&WorldReportlastMa

8、yseemedtosuggest.Theenvironmentalists,inevitably,respondtosuchcritics.Thetrueenemiesofscience,arguesPaulErichofStanfordUniversity,apioneerofenvironmental26清华大学考研辅导强化班课程讲义(bymistysky)studies,arethosewhoquestiontheevidencesupportin

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。