由易学思想设计的三个物理实验（three physics experiments designed by yi ology thought）

《由易学思想设计的三个物理实验（three physics experiments designed by yi ology thought）》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、由易学思想设计的三个物理实验（ThreephysicsexperimentsdesignedbyYiologythought）Threephysicsexperiments(1),designedbyYiologythought,provethattheuniverseisnotexpandingIn1929,Harbertdeclared,"theuniverseisexpanding.".Thespacebetweengalaxiesincreaseslinearlywithtime,andthegalaxyitselfdoesnotchange;andthefartherthegal

2、axygoes,thefasteritgoes[1-P115].Then,byLemet,Gamowetal.Developmentofthebigbangtheory,thebasicpointis:inthe100-200millionyearsago,theuniverseoflifeinabigbang,matter,energy,timeandspacearecreatedbytheexplosion,theexplosionbeforetheoriginalinfinitedenseiscalledsingularity,theexpansioncausedbytheexplo

3、sionnow,continues.Since30s,theexpandinguniversemodelhasbeenacceptedbymostcosmologists,nowknownasthemoderncosmologicalstandardmodel.Moderncosmologyisdefinedas:"onthegeneralrelativitytheory,basedontheHarbertlawastheobservationbasis,andinthecosmologicalprincipleundertheassumptionofadisciplinestructur

4、e,movementandevolutionoftheuniverseasawhole"(2-P85).After15years,SlivatameetingoftheAmericanAstronomicalSociety,theobservationwasannounced:"somebrightNebula(laterprovedtobebothablueshift,Galaxy),alsohasaredshift";furtherweaklightnebula,"allshowredshift"(1-P111).Noexplanationhasbeenmade.Harberteffe

5、ctivelywiththeladder"methodisusedtosolvetheproblemofdeterminingthedistancestogalaxies,throughtheanalysisoftheirdeterminationof24extragalacticdistance,foundthatroughlythesameredshiftgalaxiesisproportionaltothedistance,namely(1-/lambdalambda0)(lambdalambda02-=D1/D2).Itwasgenerallybelievedthat"theonl

6、ypossibleexplanationisthatphysicsingalaxiesisproportionaltotheirdistancefromusspeedbackto3-P140,sothattheH=V/D,knownasHarbert'slaw.Amongthem,HistheHarbertconstant,Disthegalaxydistance,andVisthegalaxyretreatingvelocity.NeitherDnorVaremeasurablequantities(8-P403).Harbert'slawasthebasisoftheoriginalc

7、ode,theexpansionofthecosmosofmoderncosmologyobservationbasis,thereareflaws:1,thelawisneitherphysicalobservable,whycanbecome"observationalevidence"?Andthelackofobservationaldataasanecessarycondition,howtodetermine