资源描述：
《historical materialism today an interview with anthony giddens外语英文电子书》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、Theory,Culture&Societyhttp://tcs.sagepub.comHistoricalMaterialismToday:AnInterviewwithAnthonyGiddensJosefBleicherandMikeFeatherstoneTheoryCultureSociety1982;1;63DOI:10.1177/026327648200100206Theonlineversionofthisarticlecanbefoundat:http://tcs.sagepub.comPubl
2、ishedby:http://www.sagepublications.comOnbehalfof:TheTCSCentre,NottinghamTrentUniversityAdditionalservicesandinformationforTheory,Culture&Societycanbefoundat:EmailAlerts:http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsSubscriptions:http://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionsReprin
3、ts:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navPermissions:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navDownloadedfromhttp://tcs.sagepub.combymarcinwiatrówonNovember11,2007©1982Theory,Culture&SocietyLtd..Allrightsreserved.Notforcommercialuseorunauthorizeddist
4、ribution.SymposiumonGiddensHistoricalMaterialismToday:AnInterviewwithAnthonyGiddens*JosefBleicher&MikeFeatherstoneQPerhapswecanstartwithageneralquestion.Howdoyouseethestatusofhistoricalmaterialismtoday?Aretherecorefeaturesyouwouldwishtoretainordoyouthinkitsho
5、uldberadicallyrevised?ATherearethreethingsIwouldliketoIdentifyhere.Oneisthat,IfhistoricalmaterialismmeansanythingclosetowhatMarxseemedtomeanbyhismaterialistconceptionofhistory,asforexamplesetoutinsayGermanIdeologyorCommunistManifestoorPrefacetoaContributionto
6、aCritiqueofPoliticalEconomy,Ifthosearethethreeclassicalsourcesofmaterialistconceptionofhistory,andIfMarx’sclassificationofthevarioustypesofsocietyispartofthematerialistconceptionofhistory,thenIthinkmostofthatreallyhastoberejectedinthelightofmorerecentarchaeol
7、ogicalandanthropologicalwork.Mostofthebasicnotionssimplydon’twork.Ifhistoricalmaterialismmeansamoregeneric,vaguerconceptionofmethod,somethingtodowithageneralisednotionofpraxisthenIthinkit’smoredefensible.ButifitmeanswhatItakeIttomean,somethinglikeanevolutiona
8、ryschemeofsomesort,inwhichthereIsagenerictypeofmechanismatwork,namelyclassstruggle,thenitIsanobsoleteconception.Itdoesn’treallyprovideakeytohistoryanditcan’treallybedefended.WhatI’mtrying
