Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations

Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations

ID:39401372

大小:3.25 MB

页数:35页

时间:2019-07-02

Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations_第1页
Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations_第2页
Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations_第3页
Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations_第4页
Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations_第5页
资源描述:

《Good and the Object of Natural Inclinations》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、GoodandtheObjectofNaturalInclinationsinSt.ThomasAquinas1JOHNLJENKINSWhatistherelationshipbetweenwhatwe,inourmostreflectiveandcircumspectmoments,desireorapproveofandwhatisourgood?InthisessayIwillexploretheviewsofSt.ThomasAquinasonthisissue.Iwilldevelopmyinterpre

2、tationofAquinasdialecticallybyconsideringandcriticizingaspectsoftheinfluentialinterpretationsofGermainGrisez2andJohnFinnishononehand,andRalphMclnerny,^ontheother.5Theseinterpretations,Iwill1.AnthonyKenny,BrianDavies,O.P.,RobertGeorge,RalphMclnerny,andDavidBurre

3、ll,C.S.C.,wereallmostgenerousinreadingandcommentinguponvariousversionsofthispaper,andIammostgratefulfortheirhelp.Ofcourse,theopinionsexpressedhereinaretobeascribedtomealone.ThispaperwassubstantiallycompletedinJanuary,1991andIhavebeenunabletotakenoticeofstudiesp

4、ublishedsincethen.2.GermainGrisez,"TheFirstPrincipleofPracticalReason:ACommentaryontheSummatheologiae1-2,Question94,Article2,"NaturalLawForum10(1965):168-201.3.JohnFinnis,NaturalLawandNaturalRights(Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1980).4Mclnerny'scriticismsofGrise

5、zandFinnisarefoundinEthicaThomistica(Washington,D.C.:CatholicUniversityofAmericaPress,1982).GrisezandFinnisrespondedtoMclnernyin"TheBasicPrinciplesofNaturalLaw:AReplytoRalphMclnerny,"AmericanJournalofJurisprudence26(1981):21-31.5.GrisezandFinnis'swritinghasseto

6、ffalongandvigorousdebate.Otherrecentcontributionsincludethefollowing.RobertGeorgegivesanadmirablyclear62THEGOODANDNATURALINCLINATIONS63argue,founderbecauseofimproperanalysesandcommonmisunder-standingsofkeytermsinAquinas.OncewehaveapropergraspofAquinas'sposition

7、,wecanbetterappreciateitastheinterestingandsubtleethicaltheorythatitis.AlthoughtheGrisez-FinnisinterpretationdiffersfromMclnerny'sonseveralpoints,twoissuesarecentral.Bothoftheseissueshavetodowiththeputativedistinctionbetweenfactsaboutournaturalin-clinationsando

8、urgood,andonedifficultyinadjudicatingthisdebateisthatthedisputantsfailtodistinguishclearlybetweenthesedistinctissues.ThefirstconcernsthequestionofwhetherThomasthoughtthatasu

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。