Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf

Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf

ID:34521441

大小:163.02 KB

页数:12页

时间:2019-03-07

Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf_第1页
Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf_第2页
Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf_第3页
Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf_第4页
Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf_第5页
资源描述:

《Michael E. Porter &ampamp;amp; Mark R. Kramer - The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy [2002].pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、TheCompetitiveAdvantageofCorporatePhilanthropybyMichaelE.PorterandMarkR.Kramerorporatephilanthropyisindecline.Char-high-profilesponsorships.AlthoughitstillrepresentsonlyCitablecontributionsbyU.S.companiesfell14.5%asmallproportionofoverallcorporatecharitableexpen-inrealdoll

2、arslastyear,andoverthelast15years,ditures,U.S.corporatespendingoncause-relatedmar-corporategivingasapercentageofprofitshasdroppedketingjumpedfrom$125millionin1990toanestimatedby50%.Thereasonsarenothardtounderstand.Ex-$828millionin2002.Artssponsorshipsaregrowing,ecutivesinc

3、reasinglyseethem-too–theyaccountedforanaddi-selvesinano-winsituation,caughttional$589millionin2001.WhilebetweencriticsdemandingeverMostcompaniesfeelthesecampaignsdoprovidemuch-higherlevelsof“corporatesocialcompelledtogivetocharity.neededsupporttoworthycauses,responsibilit

4、y”andinvestorsap-theyareintendedasmuchtoin-plyingrelentlesspressuretomax-Fewhavefiguredoutcreasecompanyvisibilityandim-imizeshort-termprofits.Givinghowtodoitwell.proveemployeemoraleastocre-moredoesnotsatisfythecritics–atesocialimpact.Tobaccogiantthemorecompaniesdonate,thePh

5、ilipMorris,forexample,spentmoreisexpectedofthem.Andexecutivesfindithard,if$75milliononitscharitablecontributionsin1999andnotimpossible,tojustifycharitableexpendituresintermsthenlauncheda$100millionadvertisingcampaigntoofbottom-linebenefit.publicizethem.Notsurprisingly,there

6、aregenuineThisdilemmahasledmanycompaniestoseektobedoubtsaboutwhethersuchapproachesactuallyworkormorestrategicintheirphilanthropy.Butwhatpassesforjustbreedpubliccynicismaboutcompanymotives.(See“strategicphilanthropy”todayisalmostnevertrulystra-thesidebar“TheMythofStrategic

7、Philanthropy.”)tegic,andoftenitisn’tevenparticularlyeffectiveasphil-Giventhecurrenthazinesssurroundingcorporatephil-anthropy.Increasingly,philanthropyisusedasaformofanthropy,thisseemsanappropriatetimetorevisitthepublicrelationsoradvertising,promotingacompany’smostbasicofq

8、uestions:Shouldcorporationsengageinimageorbrandthroughcause-relatedmarketingorotherphilanthropya

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。