资源描述:
《Cook,.Henry.and.Gilberg.-.American.Chess-Nuts.-.A.Collection.Of.Problems.1868》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、AMERICANCHESS-NUTSACOLLECTIONOFPROBLEMSBYCOMPOSERSOFTHEWESTERNWORLD.EDITEDBYE.B.COOK,W.R.HENRY,ANDC.A.GILBERG.[1868]“Sweetestnuthathsourestrind.”AnElectronicEditionAndersThulin,Malmö·preliminaryversionAMERICANCHESS-NUTSINTRODUCTIONThemostappropriatepreludetoanopeningofthe
2、Nuts,seemstobeanaccountofhowtheseleaveshavegrownandbornetheirfruit.InFebruary,1859,thewriterreceivedaveryinterestinganonymousletter,calculatedtoexcitethedesireofbecomingbet-teracquaintedwithitsauthor.“Idonotknow,”saidtheunknown,“whetheryouareacollectorofChessCuriosities.I
3、hopeyouarenot.Andyet,IinconsistentlyenclosetitleandspecimenpagesofaChessbookthatwasneitherprintednorpublished,andofwhichtheonlycopyistobefoundinmyChesslibrary(eightyvolumes,withprospectsofaspeedyincreasetoonehundredandthirty—allmodernworksofpracticalvalue.)Thisworkisinten
4、dedtoconsistofaprettycompletecollectionofsuchproblemsashaveappearedinnewspapers,etc.Itnowcontainsaboutfourthousandposi-tions;butwhetherIshallhavethepatiencetomakeanygreatad-ditiontothisnumber,Icannotundertaketosay,althoughmyno-tationisconciseenoughtoenablemetocopyinoneeve
5、ningsometimesasmanyasahundredproblemsandtheirsolutions.”Thetitlepagereferredtowasinprint,andread:“Chess-Nuts;aCollectionofProblemsandEndGames.”IntheCorrespondenceoftheProblemDepartmentoftheChessMonthlywasinsertedanoticeto“Cryptograph,NewYork,”inwhichhewastoldthatthewriter
6、“wouldbedelightedtosee——athisresidence.”Thisledtoasecondmissive,signedbytherealnameofthemysteriouscorrespondent.Areplytothisbroughtathirdletter,inwhichanofferwasmadetoloanthe“Chess-Nuts.”Inanswertoasugges-tion,thewritersays:—“IfIwonderwhetheralargecollectionofVVIAMERICANC
7、HESS-NUTSproblemswouldpaypublishingexpenses,E.B.C.mustlookuponhimselfasthecauserofthewonder.Alexandre,issuedadozenyearssince,isnotoutofprint—whichisn’tencouraging.****Whycan’tsomedollaredChess-manbeamiableenoughtolooksomepossiblelossintheface,and,inreturn,belookedinthefac
8、ebysomecertainglory?AmIwronginsupposingthatE.B.C.wouldliketobetheEditor,inwholeorinpart,ofsuchaw