欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:58156428
大小:299.67 KB
页数:3页
时间:2020-04-25
《以家庭为中心护理模式在造口患儿中的应用研究-论文.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在应用文档-天天文库。
1、·4·JournalofNursingScienceAug.2014Vo1.29No.16·论著·以家庭为中心护理模式在造口患儿中的应用研究卞荆晶,朱丹,胡露红摘要:目的探讨以家庭为中心护理模式在造口患儿护理中的应用效果。方法将67例肠造口惠儿按时间段分为对照组(34例)和观察组(33例),对照组按照常规方法护理,观察组采取以家庭为中心护理模式,包括心理护理和人文关怀,鼓励照护者参与全程护理,多途径的健康教育,建立出院指导标准。比较两组患儿术后住院时间,造1:2周围皮肤情况,以及家庭造口护理能力。结
2、果观察组术后住院时间显著短于对照组(P<0.01),造口周围皮肤情况显著优于对照组(P<0.01),家庭造1:2护理能力4个维度及总分显著高于对照组(P3、6.004Family-centerednu~ingcaremodelinchildrenwithcoiostomyfiBianJingjing,ZhuDan,HuLuhong}{PediatricSurgery,TongJiHospital,TongjiMedicalCollege,HuazhongUniversityofScienceTechnology,Wuhan430030,China)Abstract:ObjectiveToexploretheeffectoffamily-centered4、nursingcaremodelinchildrenwithcolostomy.MethodsTotally,67pa—tientswithintestinalcolostomywererandomizedinto2groups。withthecontro1groupof34casesandtheobservationgroupof33ones.Thecontrolgroupweregivenconventionalnursing,whiletheobservationgroupweregivenn5、ursingcareaccordingtothefamily-centeredmodel,includingpsychologicalnursing,humanisticcare,parentsparticipation,healtheducationinvariouswaysandestablishingstandardsfordischargeguidance.Thepostoperativehospita1izationdays,colostomysurroundingskinandhomec6、areabiiityofthetwogroupswerecompared.ResultsThepostoperativehospitalizationdaysoftheobservationgroupwerelessthanthecontrolgroup(P7、igherscoresinthe4dimensionsandtotalscoresoffamilynursingabilitythanthecontrolgroup(P<0.05,P<0.01).ConclusionFamily—centerednursingmode1canimprovethecolostomysurroundingskin,shortenthepostoperativehospita“zationdaysandimprovefamilycolostomynursingabilit8、y.Keywords:colostomy;stoma;family-centerednursing;caregiver;informationsharing;humanicticcaring肠造瘘术为患儿结肠、直肠和肛门严重疾病的常18例,全结肠型巨结肠6例,肠狭窄8例,肠闭锁7见手术。由于患儿不具备自理能力,造口护理主要由例,各种原因导致的肠穿孔28例。按造瘘部位划分:照护者完成,其间家庭的支持和配合非常重要。因此回肠末端造瘘术32例,结肠造瘘术35例,均为单孑L提
3、6.004Family-centerednu~ingcaremodelinchildrenwithcoiostomyfiBianJingjing,ZhuDan,HuLuhong}{PediatricSurgery,TongJiHospital,TongjiMedicalCollege,HuazhongUniversityofScienceTechnology,Wuhan430030,China)Abstract:ObjectiveToexploretheeffectoffamily-centered
4、nursingcaremodelinchildrenwithcolostomy.MethodsTotally,67pa—tientswithintestinalcolostomywererandomizedinto2groups。withthecontro1groupof34casesandtheobservationgroupof33ones.Thecontrolgroupweregivenconventionalnursing,whiletheobservationgroupweregivenn
5、ursingcareaccordingtothefamily-centeredmodel,includingpsychologicalnursing,humanisticcare,parentsparticipation,healtheducationinvariouswaysandestablishingstandardsfordischargeguidance.Thepostoperativehospita1izationdays,colostomysurroundingskinandhomec
6、areabiiityofthetwogroupswerecompared.ResultsThepostoperativehospitalizationdaysoftheobservationgroupwerelessthanthecontrolgroup(P7、igherscoresinthe4dimensionsandtotalscoresoffamilynursingabilitythanthecontrolgroup(P<0.05,P<0.01).ConclusionFamily—centerednursingmode1canimprovethecolostomysurroundingskin,shortenthepostoperativehospita“zationdaysandimprovefamilycolostomynursingabilit8、y.Keywords:colostomy;stoma;family-centerednursing;caregiver;informationsharing;humanicticcaring肠造瘘术为患儿结肠、直肠和肛门严重疾病的常18例,全结肠型巨结肠6例,肠狭窄8例,肠闭锁7见手术。由于患儿不具备自理能力,造口护理主要由例,各种原因导致的肠穿孔28例。按造瘘部位划分:照护者完成,其间家庭的支持和配合非常重要。因此回肠末端造瘘术32例,结肠造瘘术35例,均为单孑L提
7、igherscoresinthe4dimensionsandtotalscoresoffamilynursingabilitythanthecontrolgroup(P<0.05,P<0.01).ConclusionFamily—centerednursingmode1canimprovethecolostomysurroundingskin,shortenthepostoperativehospita“zationdaysandimprovefamilycolostomynursingabilit
8、y.Keywords:colostomy;stoma;family-centerednursing;caregiver;informationsharing;humanicticcaring肠造瘘术为患儿结肠、直肠和肛门严重疾病的常18例,全结肠型巨结肠6例,肠狭窄8例,肠闭锁7见手术。由于患儿不具备自理能力,造口护理主要由例,各种原因导致的肠穿孔28例。按造瘘部位划分:照护者完成,其间家庭的支持和配合非常重要。因此回肠末端造瘘术32例,结肠造瘘术35例,均为单孑L提
此文档下载收益归作者所有